Chapter 6

Framework of Indicators

A checklist for low-rise communities in the UAE.

Sustainable Urban Development Framework for Low-Rise Residential Communities in UAE

Mhd Amer Alzaim American University of Sharjah Edition 7 September 2026
3Modules
9Pillars
66Indicators
229Dimensions
449Parameters

Building on the results presented in Chapter 5, everything evaluated is consolidated here into a single implementation checklist. No new analysis is introduced. Having been operationalised in the survey and examined through the procedures described in Chapters 3 and 4, the evidence is now organised for practical use, answering the final research question of how it can support sustainable low-rise residential communities in the UAE.

The source hierarchy is retained. Infrastructure, Housing and Urban each divide into economic, social and environmental pillars, beneath which sit 66 indicators, 229 professional dimensions and 449 parameters. Every indicator opens with a definition drawn from rating systems such as LEED-ND, BREEAM, Estidama Pearl and Green Star, followed by its lecturer dimension and supporting academic literature, while dimensions list the codes they rely on and any note recorded against them.

Each parameter carries its description, method of measurement, what respondents were asked and the value obtained. This is the 95 percent confidence bound, or the most frequent answer where mode estimation was used. Seven, all from the Urban module, returned no usable data and are marked as not analysed rather than removed. This edition, dated 7 September 2026, reports measurements only, without targets or thresholds, and is best read as a baseline for later technical review, local calibration, planning and design.

All text is taken from the study master file and questionnaire. The original numbering is kept under a 6 prefix, so any entry can be traced to its position in the framework. Full sources appear in Section 6.4.

6.1 Infrastructure

3 pillars

Economic

6.1.1

6.1.1.1

Cost Effectiveness

Maximize economic value and affordability across the project lifecycle by addressing capital, operational, and maintenance costs through efficient infrastructure delivery, life-cycle costing, and value engineering, while ensuring affordability for residents and resilience of the local economy.

Dimensions. Capital investment, cost savings, lifecycle cost analysis

6.1.1.1.1 Operational Cost Saving

6.1.1.1.1.1
% reduction in operating costs vs. baseline

Demonstrate reduced operating costs compared to baseline standards, with potential asset value increase

Method. (Annual operating costs baseline – design case) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 15

6.1.1.1.2 Life-Cycle Costing (LCC)

6.1.1.1.2.1
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis completion

Conduct a Life-Cycle Costing analysis covering capital, operational, and maintenance costs over the project lifespan, including payback periods (X–Y years)

Method. Full LCC model per ISO 15686-5 standard

Measured value —
6.1.1.1.2.2
Payback period (years)

Conduct a Life-Cycle Costing analysis covering capital, operational, and maintenance costs over the project lifespan, including payback periods (X–Y years)

Method. Capital investment ÷ annual savings

Measured value 7.5

6.1.1.1.3 Capital Cost Efficiency

6.1.1.1.3.1
% reduction in capital costs vs. baseline design

Achieve infrastructure capital cost savings via design innovation, typically 10–20% without compromising performance

Method. (Baseline cost – optimized design cost) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 7.5

6.1.1.1.4 Maintenance Cost Reduction

6.1.1.1.4.1
% savings in maintenance costs

Provide evidence of reduced infrastructure maintenance costs, expressed as % savings or cost per household/year, target range ($___ – $___) annually

Method. (Baseline annual maintenance cost – actual/projected cost) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 10.70
6.1.1.1.4.2
Annual maintenance cost per household (USD/AED)

Provide evidence of reduced infrastructure maintenance costs, expressed as % savings or cost per household/year, target range ($___ – $___) annually

Method. Total annual community maintenance ÷ # households

Measured value 375

6.1.1.1.5 Affordability Benchmark

Maintain housing costs ≤ 30% of median household income

6.1.1.1.6 Local Economic Value

Demonstrate positive local economic multiplier effect (e.g., proportion of expenditure spent locally; range varies) and/or proportion of local jobs created

6.1.1.1.7 Value Engineering Outcomes

6.1.1.1.7.1
# of VE measures implemented

Document implemented value engineering measures that deliver measurable cost savings

Method. Count design modifications categorized as VE

Measured value 6.18
6.1.1.1.7.2
Monetary savings from VE (USD/AED)

Document implemented value engineering measures that deliver measurable cost savings

Method. Summation of cost avoided/saved by VE measures

Measured value 5.6
6.1.1.2

Economic Growth

Promote sustainable local economic development by creating permanent jobs, fostering diverse and mixed-use economies, supporting local procurement, and enhancing economic resilience through developments that align with community needs and long-term prosperity.

6.1.1.2.1 Jobs-to-Housing Ratio

6.1.1.2.1.1
Jobs-to-housing ratio

Achieve a balance between the number of jobs and housing units to ensure employment accessibility for residents

Method. (# jobs within community ÷ # housing units)

Measured value 1.13

6.1.1.2.2 Proximity to Employment

6.1.1.2.2.1
% of housing within 800 m of major employment centers / transit

Design developments near existing or planned employment centers to reduce commuting distances

Method. GIS mapping of housing vs. employment nodes/transit

Measured value 50.54

6.1.1.2.3 Job Creation

6.1.1.2.3.1
Construction-phase jobs

Track and report the number of jobs created during construction and post-completion, expressed as total jobs or jobs per 100 residents

Method. Total worker labor hours ÷ 1,800 (FTE)

Measured value 10
6.1.1.2.3.2
Operational-phase jobs

Track and report the number of jobs created during construction and post-completion, expressed as total jobs or jobs per 100 residents

Method. # permanent jobs created post-completion ÷ total residents

Measured value 30

6.1.1.2.4 Local Procurement

6.1.1.2.4.1
% local procurement (value)

Measure the percentage of materials, services, and labor sourced locally

Method. (Value of local materials/labor ÷ total procurement value) ×100

Measured value 35

6.1.1.2.5 Unemployment Rate Monitoring

6.1.1.2.5.1
Community unemployment rate (%)

Track changes in unemployment rate within the community post-development

Method. (# unemployed ÷ total labor force) ×100

Measured value 2
6.1.1.3

Efficiency of Infrastructure

Optimize the design, operation, and integration of utility and infrastructure systems to reduce energy and water losses, enhance shared resource use, incorporate renewable and recycled resources, and ensure reliable, low-impact services across the community.

6.1.1.3.1 Energy Efficiency in Infrastructure

6.1.1.3.1.1
% of public lighting upgraded to LED

Implement energy-efficient systems such as LED street lighting, smart grids, and district energy networks

Method. (# LED luminaires ÷ total luminaires) ×100

Measured value 75
6.1.1.3.1.2
Smart grid deployment coverage (%)

Implement energy-efficient systems such as LED street lighting, smart grids, and district energy networks

Method. (# households connected to smart meters ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 80

6.1.1.3.2 Renewable Energy Integration

6.1.1.3.2.1
% renewable energy supply (community scale)

% of operational energy supplied by community-scale renewable systems

Method. (Energy from community renewables ÷ total demand) ×100

Measured value 25

6.1.1.3.3 Water Efficiency

6.1.1.3.3.1
% reduction in non-revenue water (NRW)

% reduction in potable water network losses and % of water demand met by recycled or rainwater sources

Method. (Baseline losses – actual losses) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 24.51
6.1.1.3.3.2
% demand met by non-potable water

% reduction in potable water network losses and % of water demand met by recycled or rainwater sources

Method. (Recycled + rainwater supply ÷ total water demand) ×100

Measured value 20.88

6.1.1.3.4 Shared Infrastructure Utilization

6.1.1.3.4.1
% of cooling demand served by district cooling

Incorporate shared or precinct-scale services (e.g., district cooling, wastewater recycling, integrated utility corridors)

Method. (District cooling capacity ÷ total cooling demand) ×100

Measured value 57.5
6.1.1.3.4.2
% wastewater recycled at precinct scale

Incorporate shared or precinct-scale services (e.g., district cooling, wastewater recycling, integrated utility corridors)

Method. (Recycled wastewater ÷ total wastewater generated) ×100

Measured value 35

6.1.1.3.5 Performance Benchmarks

6.1.1.3.5.1
District cooling efficiency (kW/Ton)

Track district cooling efficiency (kW/Ton), water consumption improvements over baseline (%), and renewable energy contribution (%)

Method. Annual kWh ÷ annual cooling ton-hours

Measured value 0.85
6.1.1.3.5.2
% water consumption reduction vs. baseline

Track district cooling efficiency (kW/Ton), water consumption improvements over baseline (%), and renewable energy contribution (%)

Method. (Baseline per capita consumption – actual) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 19.91
6.1.1.3.5.3
% renewable energy contribution (district)

Track district cooling efficiency (kW/Ton), water consumption improvements over baseline (%), and renewable energy contribution (%)

Method. (Renewable contribution ÷ total energy use) ×100

Measured value 27.76

6.1.1.3.6 Infrastructure Material Efficiency

6.1.1.3.6.1
% of recycled/reclaimed materials in infrastructure

% of infrastructure materials from recycled or reclaimed sources

Method. (Mass of recycled materials ÷ total materials used) ×100

Measured value 24.33

6.1.1.3.7 Reliability & Resilience

6.1.1.3.7.1
# of outages per year per 1000 households

Monitor outages/year and design redundancy into utility layouts to minimize service disruption

Method. (Annual outages ÷ households ×1000)

Measured value 1.62
6.1.1.3.7.2
Redundancy in critical systems (%)

Monitor outages/year and design redundancy into utility layouts to minimize service disruption

Method. (# critical systems with redundancy ÷ total critical systems) ×100

Measured value 60
6.1.1.4

Financial Sustainability

Ensure the long-term economic viability of communities by integrating life-cycle financial planning, securing sustainable funding for community assets, maintaining housing affordability, and reducing living costs through sustainable design measures.

6.1.1.4.1 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCC)

6.1.1.4.1.1
Completion of LCC study

Conduct a full LCC to evaluate capital, operational, and maintenance costs over the project lifespan

Method. Conduct full analysis per ISO 15686-5 framework, including Net Present Value (NPV), payback, and sensitivity analysis

Measured value —
6.1.1.4.1.2
Payback period (years)

Conduct a full LCC to evaluate capital, operational, and maintenance costs over the project lifespan

Method. Total incremental investment ÷ annual operational savings

Measured value 7.5
6.1.1.4.1.3
Life-cycle cost savings (%)

Conduct a full LCC to evaluate capital, operational, and maintenance costs over the project lifespan

Method. (Baseline lifecycle cost – optimized lifecycle cost) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 12.42

6.1.1.4.2 Funding Plans for Community Assets

6.1.1.4.2.1
Presence of dedicated funding mechanism

Establish long-term funding mechanisms (e.g., endowments, HOA funds, municipal budget allocations) for ongoing maintenance of facilities

Method. Verify creation of HOA reserves, endowments, sinking funds, or municipal budget allocations

Measured value —
6.1.1.4.2.2
Funding adequacy ratio (%)

Establish long-term funding mechanisms (e.g., endowments, HOA funds, municipal budget allocations) for ongoing maintenance of facilities

Method. (Annual funds allocated ÷ annual maintenance needs) ×100

Measured value 100
6.1.1.4.2.3
Long-term maintenance plan (years)

Establish long-term funding mechanisms (e.g., endowments, HOA funds, municipal budget allocations) for ongoing maintenance of facilities

Method. Length of planning horizon covered by secured funding

Measured value 15.41
6.1.1.5

Maintenance

Ensure the long-term durability and hygiene of community assets by incorporating durable design principles and establishing protocols for cleaning and disinfection to maintain occupant health and safety.

6.1.1.5.1 Durable Design (Materials & Infrastructure)

6.1.1.5.1.1
% of materials meeting durability standards

Select durable, modular, and easily replaceable materials to reduce lifecycle maintenance costs and extend asset longevity.

Method. (Value of durable/modular/recyclable materials ÷ total material value) ×100

Measured value 56.25
6.1.1.5.1.2
Average service life of key components (years)

Select durable, modular, and easily replaceable materials to reduce lifecycle maintenance costs and extend asset longevity.

Method. Document expected service life of structure, finishes, MEP vs. baseline values

Measured value 3.34
6.1.1.5.1.3
Lifecycle maintenance cost savings (%)

Select durable, modular, and easily replaceable materials to reduce lifecycle maintenance costs and extend asset longevity.

Method. (Baseline lifecycle maintenance cost – optimized design cost) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 13.56
6.1.1.5.1.4
% of modular/replacement-ready components

Select durable, modular, and easily replaceable materials to reduce lifecycle maintenance costs and extend asset longevity.

Method. (Modular elements with replaceable parts ÷ total components) ×100

Measured value 36.28
Social

6.1.2

6.1.2.1

Health and Well-being

Promote physical and mental health and ensure community well-being by providing equitable access to active living opportunities, high-quality indoor and outdoor environments, green and recreational spaces, and essential health services, while fostering safe, comfortable, and inclusive public spaces, supporting walkability, promoting thermal and acoustic comfort, and safeguarding air, water, and light quality.

6.1.2.1.1 Active Living Infrastructure

6.1.2.1.1.1
Length of active mobility infrastructure (km per 1,000 residents)

Miles/km of walking and cycling paths, jogging tracks, or equivalent per capita.

Method. (Total km of walkways, cycle lanes, jogging tracks ÷ community population) ×1,000

Measured value 3
6.1.2.1.1.2
% of homes within 400 m of a walking/cycling path

Miles/km of walking and cycling paths, jogging tracks, or equivalent per capita.

Method. GIS network analysis from housing units to active paths

Measured value 75
6.1.2.1.1.3
% of streets with continuous sidewalks

Miles/km of walking and cycling paths, jogging tracks, or equivalent per capita.

Method. (# of streets with compliant sidewalks ÷ total streets) ×100

Measured value 78.75

6.1.2.1.2 Environmental Quality Standards

6.1.2.1.2.1
Ambient air pollutants

Meet thresholds for air pollutants (PM₂.₅, NO₂, etc.), safe drinking water standards, and adequate daylighting

Method. Continuous monitoring of PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, NO₂, O₃, CO

Measured value —
6.1.2.1.2.2
Drinking water quality compliance

Meet thresholds for air pollutants (PM₂.₅, NO₂, etc.), safe drinking water standards, and adequate daylighting

Method. Test potable water against WHO/national standards

Measured value 1
6.1.2.1.2.3
Daylight performance in buildings

Meet thresholds for air pollutants (PM₂.₅, NO₂, etc.), safe drinking water standards, and adequate daylighting

Method. Daylight Factor (DF) or Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA 300/50%)

Measured value 60
6.1.2.2

Technology and Innovation

Foster innovation in community design and integrate advanced digital infrastructure to support emerging technologies, cultural practices, and connectivity.

6.1.2.2.1 Innovative Design & Practices

6.1.2.2.1.1
# of innovative measures adopted

Adopt innovative strategies or emerging technologies that improve sustainability or cultural responsiveness; credited as bonus points.

Method. Count new design/technology solutions not covered under standard credits (e.g., net-positive energy systems, AI-driven energy management, biophilic design, cultural architecture integration)

Measured value 1
6.1.2.2.1.2
Performance verification of innovation

Adopt innovative strategies or emerging technologies that improve sustainability or cultural responsiveness; credited as bonus points.

Method. Measurable outcome must be demonstrated (energy, water, cultural/social benefit)

Measured value —

6.1.2.2.2 Digital Infrastructure Provision

6.1.2.2.2.1
% of households with broadband access

Ensure access to modern ICT, including high-speed broadband and public Wi-Fi, to enhance economic productivity and social connectivity.

Method. (# households with high-speed broadband ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 92.5
6.1.2.2.2.2
Public Wi-Fi coverage (% of community area)

Ensure access to modern ICT, including high-speed broadband and public Wi-Fi, to enhance economic productivity and social connectivity.

Method. (Area with free public Wi-Fi ÷ total community area) ×100

Measured value 57.5
6.1.2.2.2.3
Average broadband speed (Mbps)

Ensure access to modern ICT, including high-speed broadband and public Wi-Fi, to enhance economic productivity and social connectivity.

Method. Average download/upload speed recorded

Measured value 373.60
6.1.2.3

Quality of life

Enhancing residents’ quality of life by ensuring access to green and public spaces, walkable and connected communities, proximity to essential community facilities, and the presence of cultural, leisure, and educational opportunities.

6.1.2.3.1 Public Realm and Connectivity

6.1.2.3.1.1
% of dwellings within 300 m of public open space

Interconnected open space networks, clustering of parks, and accessible public realm designs

Method. GIS mapping of residential units to nearest park/public space

Measured value 91.25
6.1.2.3.1.2
Public open space provision (m² per capita)

Interconnected open space networks, clustering of parks, and accessible public realm designs

Method. (Total public open space area ÷ resident population)

Measured value 7.84
6.1.2.3.1.3
% of interconnected open space network

Interconnected open space networks, clustering of parks, and accessible public realm designs

Method. (Connected open space corridors ÷ total open space) ×100

Measured value 73.75
6.1.2.3.1.4
Accessibility of public realm (universal design compliance)

Interconnected open space networks, clustering of parks, and accessible public realm designs

Method. % of parks/public spaces compliant with accessibility standards

Measured value 1.00
6.1.2.4

Safety

Promoting safe and secure communities through crime prevention design strategies, effective lighting, noise management, and monitoring of crime-related statistics.

6.1.2.4.1 Lighting Standards

6.1.2.4.1.1
Illuminance on sidewalks (lux)

Adequate illumination for public areas, with sidewalks meeting ≥50 lux at night

Method. Night-time light measurement at pedestrian level (1.5 m)

Measured value 48.96

6.1.2.4.2 Noise Control

6.1.2.4.2.1
Daytime outdoor noise levels (dBA)

Limiting ambient outdoor noise to ≤55 dBA in public environments

Method. Continuous noise monitoring in residential/public zones

Measured value 27.5

6.1.2.4.3 Public Safety Metrics

6.1.2.4.3.1
Police officers per 100,000 residents

Monitoring police officers per 100k and homicide rate per 100k residents

Method. (# active-duty police ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 187.18
6.1.2.4.3.2
Homicide rate per 100,000 residents

Monitoring police officers per 100k and homicide rate per 100k residents

Method. (# homicides ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 4
6.1.2.5

Urbanism

Design compact, mixed-use, and transit-oriented communities with high street connectivity and reliable public transport access to reduce car dependence and enhance walkability.

6.1.2.5.1 Transit-Oriented Density

6.1.2.5.1.1
Residential density near transit (du/ha)

Achieve compact/mixed-use/TOD patterns near transit (e.g., LEED-ND credit for Compact/Mixed-Use/TOD; Estidama corridor minimums such as ≥60 du/ha near major nodes)

Method. (# dwelling units within 800 m of major transit ÷ area in ha)

Measured value 70
6.1.2.5.1.2
% mixed-use floor area within 800 m of transit

Achieve compact/mixed-use/TOD patterns near transit (e.g., LEED-ND credit for Compact/Mixed-Use/TOD; Estidama corridor minimums such as ≥60 du/ha near major nodes)

Method. (Mixed-use GFA within 800 m ÷ total GFA) ×100

Measured value 43.03

6.1.2.5.2 Connectivity & Street Network

6.1.2.5.2.1
Connectivity Index

Provide a connected grid that meets local standards (e.g., Average Connectivity Index ≥1.5; ≥75% of intersections meeting spacing criteria; BREEAM requires connectivity though no fixed density).

Method. (# links ÷ # nodes)

Measured value 1.55
6.1.2.5.2.2
% of intersections meeting spacing criteria

Provide a connected grid that meets local standards (e.g., Average Connectivity Index ≥1.5; ≥75% of intersections meeting spacing criteria; BREEAM requires connectivity though no fixed density).

Method. (# intersections within 90–150 m spacing ÷ total intersections) ×100

Measured value 70.81
6.1.2.5.2.3
Average block length (m)

Provide a connected grid that meets local standards (e.g., Average Connectivity Index ≥1.5; ≥75% of intersections meeting spacing criteria; BREEAM requires connectivity though no fixed density).

Method. Mean block length in development

Measured value 135

6.1.2.5.3 Transit Accessibility

6.1.2.5.3.1
% population within 400–500 m of frequent transit

Ensure residents live within walkable distance to quality transit (e.g., % population within 0.5 km of frequent service; transport assessment per TM-01).

Method. (# residents within 400–500 m walk of transit stop ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 56.25
6.1.2.5.3.2
Transit service frequency

Ensure residents live within walkable distance to quality transit (e.g., % population within 0.5 km of frequent service; transport assessment per TM-01).

Method. Peak-hour headways (minutes)

Measured value 12.64
Environmental

6.1.3

6.1.3.1

Resource Conservation

Promote sustainable management of water, waste, and related infrastructure, emphasizing stormwater control, green infrastructure, efficient resource use, and equitable service delivery.

6.1.3.1.1 Stormwater & Runoff Control

6.1.3.1.1.1
Post-development runoff rate vs. pre-development

Evaluate stormwater management practices ensuring no net increase in runoff; incorporate treatment measures such as infiltration systems or oil separators.

Method. Hydrologic modeling (e.g., Rational Method, SWMM)

Measured value —
6.1.3.1.1.2
% of runoff treated before discharge

Evaluate stormwater management practices ensuring no net increase in runoff; incorporate treatment measures such as infiltration systems or oil separators.

Method. Volume of stormwater treated ÷ total runoff

Measured value 80

6.1.3.1.2 Green Infrastructure & Water Systems

6.1.3.1.2.1
% of development area with green infrastructure

Promote decentralized water/waste systems and green infrastructure for resource efficiency and resilience.

Method. (GI area ÷ total site area) ×100

Measured value 17.5
6.1.3.1.2.2
Decentralized water reuse (L/day or % demand)

Promote decentralized water/waste systems and green infrastructure for resource efficiency and resilience.

Method. Volume of greywater/rainwater reused ÷ total demand

Measured value 15

6.1.3.1.3 Community Water Supply

6.1.3.1.3.1
% of population with safe water access

Measure percentage of population with reliable and safe water supply.

Method. (# people with piped safe water ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 98.75

6.1.3.1.4 Wastewater Treatment

6.1.3.1.4.1
% wastewater safely treated

Track percentage of wastewater safely collected and treated before discharge.

Method. (Volume treated ÷ total wastewater generated) ×100

Measured value 83.75

6.1.3.1.5 Solid Waste Recycling & Collection

6.1.3.1.5.1
% municipal solid waste recycled

Measure percentage of solid waste recycled and percentage of population with access to waste collection services.

Method. (Recycled MSW ÷ total MSW generated) ×100

Measured value 31.25
6.1.3.1.5.2
% of population with access to waste collection

Measure percentage of solid waste recycled and percentage of population with access to waste collection services.

Method. (# population served ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 96.25
6.1.3.2

Energy Efficiency

Promote sustainable energy management at the community scale, emphasizing reduced per-capita consumption, adoption of renewable energy, and mitigation of urban heat effects through design and planning.

6.1.3.2.1 Community Energy Strategy

6.1.3.2.1.1
Existence of a formal community energy strategy

Evaluate presence of a community-level energy strategy addressing efficiency, renewable integration, and reduction in demand.

Method. Verify documented strategy including energy efficiency goals, renewable targets, and demand reduction measures

Measured value —
6.1.3.2.1.2
% reduction in projected community energy demand vs. baseline

Evaluate presence of a community-level energy strategy addressing efficiency, renewable integration, and reduction in demand.

Method. Energy modeling at community scale (baseline = ASHRAE 90.1 or local code)

Measured value 17.5
6.1.3.2.1.3
% of community demand met by renewables

Evaluate presence of a community-level energy strategy addressing efficiency, renewable integration, and reduction in demand.

Method. (Annual renewable energy generated ÷ total community energy demand) ×100

Measured value 20
6.1.3.2.1.4
% of buildings connected to district energy

Evaluate presence of a community-level energy strategy addressing efficiency, renewable integration, and reduction in demand.

Method. (# buildings connected ÷ total buildings) ×100

Measured value 80
6.1.3.2.1.5
Monitoring & reporting systems (smart meters / dashboards)

Evaluate presence of a community-level energy strategy addressing efficiency, renewable integration, and reduction in demand.

Method. Verify presence of real-time energy monitoring at building and district levels

Measured value —

6.1.3.2.2 Community-Scale Energy Infrastructure

6.1.3.2.2.1
Installed renewable energy capacity (kW or MW)

Presence and capacity of renewable generation (kW) and/or storage systems (battery, district cooling/heating).

Method. Sum of installed nameplate capacity of PV, wind, or other renewable plants at community/district level

Measured value 21.51
6.1.3.2.2.2
Renewable contribution to community energy demand (%)

Presence and capacity of renewable generation (kW) and/or storage systems (battery, district cooling/heating).

Method. (Annual renewable output ÷ total annual community demand) ×100

Measured value 35
6.1.3.2.2.3
District cooling/heating coverage (% of buildings)

Presence and capacity of renewable generation (kW) and/or storage systems (battery, district cooling/heating).

Method. (# buildings connected to district system ÷ total buildings) ×100

Measured value 57.5
6.1.3.2.2.4
Thermal plant efficiency (kW/ton cooling)

Presence and capacity of renewable generation (kW) and/or storage systems (battery, district cooling/heating).

Method. Annual kWh ÷ annual ton-hours

Measured value 0.79
6.1.3.2.2.5
Energy storage capacity (kWh or MWh)

Presence and capacity of renewable generation (kW) and/or storage systems (battery, district cooling/heating).

Method. Installed storage system rating (capacity × duration)

Measured value 14.03
6.1.3.2.2.6
Smart grid integration (% of households with smart meters)

Presence and capacity of renewable generation (kW) and/or storage systems (battery, district cooling/heating).

Method. (# households with smart meters ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 85
6.1.3.3

Water

Ensure sustainable water management by reducing indoor and outdoor potable use, implementing efficient practices for cooling and decorative features, providing leak detection and metering, managing stormwater, establishing a community water strategy, tracking per-capita use, integrating the whole water cycle, and ensuring safe drinking water access.

6.1.3.3.1 Outdoor/Landscape Irrigation Efficiency

6.1.3.3.1.1
% reduction in irrigation demand vs. baseline

Reduce landscape irrigation demand to specified thresholds or percentage reductions (e.g., ≥72–75% reduction; ≤2.0 L/m²/day full credit; with prerequisite limits by land-use type).

Method. Landscape water budget model (EPA WaterSense, Estidama baseline)

Measured value 72.75

6.1.3.3.2 Cooling System (Heat Rejection) Makeup Water

6.1.3.3.2.1
% recycled water used for cooling makeup

Supply ≥75% of cooling system makeup water from recycled sources (or use none) to achieve full points.

Method. (Recycled water volume ÷ total cooling system makeup) ×100

Measured value 81.25

6.1.3.3.3 Decorative Water Features Supply

6.1.3.3.3.1
% of decorative water supplied from on-site / non-potable sources

Provide decorative water features 100% from on-site water allowance or via pool cover usage.

Method. (Non-potable supply ÷ total demand) ×100

Measured value —

6.1.3.3.4 Stormwater Management

6.1.3.3.4.1
Pollutant removal efficiency (TSS, nutrients)

Ensure post-development peak runoff ≤ pre-development and achieve pollutant removal (e.g., 90% TSS removal), with options for on-site stormwater reuse via WSUD/performance pathways.

Method. Water quality modeling/testing

Measured value 96.5

6.1.3.3.5 City/Community Per-Capita Water Use

6.1.3.3.5.1
Water consumption per capita (L/person/day)

Track water use per person via L/person/day and/or Arc Water Performance Score (min 40 prerequisite, up to 100).

Method. (Total potable water use ÷ population ÷ 365)

Measured value 194.73

6.1.3.3.6 Drinking Water Quality & Access

6.1.3.3.6.1
% population with access to safe drinking water

Ensure potable water quality meets health-based contaminant limits and provide access consistent with guidance.

Method. (# population with piped safe water ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 96.25
6.1.3.4

Resource Efficiency

Minimize environmental impact by reducing water and energy consumption, maximizing the use of recycled and locally sourced materials, and implementing waste reduction strategies that support a circular economy.

6.1.3.4.1 Water Efficiency

6.1.3.4.1.1
Per capita potable water use (L/person/day)

Potable water use per capita (L/person/day) compared to baseline or benchmark.

Method. (Total potable water supplied ÷ population ÷ 365)

Measured value 144.00

6.1.3.4.2 Energy Efficiency

6.1.3.4.2.1
% reduction vs. baseline energy model

% reduction in energy use compared to baseline or target EUI (kWh/m²/year).

Method. (Baseline EUI – actual/projected EUI) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 18
6.1.3.4.2.2
Average building energy use intensity (EUI, kWh/m²·yr)

% reduction in energy use compared to baseline or target EUI (kWh/m²/year).

Method. Annual operational energy ÷ GFA

Measured value 136.59

6.1.3.4.3 Recycled Content in Materials

6.1.3.4.3.1
% of materials by cost with recycled/reclaimed content

% of construction materials with recycled or reclaimed content.

Method. (Value of recycled materials ÷ total material value) ×100

Measured value 27.5

6.1.3.4.4 Waste Generation

6.1.3.4.4.1
Municipal waste per capita (kg/year)

Per capita municipal waste generation (kg/year)

Method. (Annual municipal waste ÷ population)

Measured value 384.69

6.1.3.4.5 Ecological Footprint

6.1.3.4.5.1
Ecological footprint (gha/person)

Average ecological footprint of residents (global hectares/person)

Method. Environmental impact model (energy, water, waste, land use per capita)

Measured value 1.75
6.1.3.5

Pollution Management

Minimize environmental pollution at the community scale by assessing and controlling air, water, soil, light, and noise impacts, through management of stormwater runoff, construction emissions, and indoor/outdoor pollutants during both construction and operation phases, ensuring compliance with recognized standards to protect ecosystems and human health.

6.1.3.5.1 Air Quality Compliance

6.1.3.5.1.1
PM₂.₅ concentration (µg/m³ annual mean)

Ambient pollutant concentrations (e.g., NO₂, PM₂.₅/PM₁₀) compared to WHO or national standards.

Method. Continuous AQ monitoring

Measured value 7.5
6.1.3.5.1.2
PM₁₀ concentration (µg/m³ daily mean)

Ambient pollutant concentrations (e.g., NO₂, PM₂.₅/PM₁₀) compared to WHO or national standards.

Method. AQI calculation, daily sampling

Measured value 48.02
6.1.3.5.1.3
NO₂ annual mean (µg/m³)

Ambient pollutant concentrations (e.g., NO₂, PM₂.₅/PM₁₀) compared to WHO or national standards.

Method. Continuous monitoring

Measured value 37.36

6.1.3.5.2 Stormwater & Runoff Quality

6.1.3.5.2.1
% of runoff treated before discharge

% of runoff treated on-site to meet quality targets (e.g., TSS, TP, TN removal rates).

Method. (Treated runoff volume ÷ total runoff volume) ×100

Measured value 85
6.1.3.5.2.2
TSS removal efficiency (%)

% of runoff treated on-site to meet quality targets (e.g., TSS, TP, TN removal rates).

Method. Lab water quality testing for TSS

Measured value 90
6.1.3.5.2.3
Nutrient removal (TN/TP)

% of runoff treated on-site to meet quality targets (e.g., TSS, TP, TN removal rates).

Method. Monitoring nitrogen and phosphorus levels

Measured value 46.53

6.1.3.5.3 Wastewater Treatment & Reuse

6.1.3.5.3.1
% wastewater treated

Treatment level (% reuse of treated water) in accordance with environmental guidelines.

Method. (Volume treated ÷ total wastewater generated) ×100

Measured value 83.75
6.1.3.5.3.2
% wastewater reused

Treatment level (% reuse of treated water) in accordance with environmental guidelines.

Method. (Reused volume ÷ total wastewater treated) ×100

Measured value 30

6.1.3.5.4 Noise Pollution Management

6.1.3.5.4.1
Daytime ambient noise (LAeq, dBA)

Ensure compliance with national, WHO, and UK standards for community noise by comparing ambient levels (e.g., LAeq) in residential and outdoor areas against target limits, such as maintaining levels below 55 dB outdoors.

Method. Long-term noise monitoring

Measured value 53.86
6.1.3.5.4.2
Nighttime ambient noise (LAeq, dBA)

Ensure compliance with national, WHO, and UK standards for community noise by comparing ambient levels (e.g., LAeq) in residential and outdoor areas against target limits, such as maintaining levels below 55 dB outdoors.

Method. Long-term noise monitoring

Measured value 43.61

6.1.3.5.5 Native Vegetation Cover

6.1.3.5.5.1
% of landscaped area native/adapted species

% of site area covered with native vegetation to aid in pollution mitigation (e.g., air quality, stormwater filtration)

Method. (Native/adapted area ÷ total landscaped area) ×100

Measured value 35

6.1.3.5.6 Water Quality

6.1.3.5.6.1
% population with access to safe drinking water

Assess compliance with drinking water quality standards (% compliance).

Method. (# population with piped water ÷ total) ×100

Measured value 98.75
6.1.3.6

Greenhouse gas emissions

Measure and mitigate community-scale greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including energy-related CO₂, transport-related carbon, and refrigerant emissions, with the aim of reducing per-capita contributions to climate change.

6.1.3.6.1 City-wide GHG Emissions Reduction

6.1.3.6.1.1
Existence of city/community GHG strategy

Consider community or city-wide GHG reduction strategies, aligned with green building, renewable energy, and low-carbon planning principles.

Method. Verify presence of documented GHG/climate action plan with targets

Measured value —
6.1.3.6.1.2
% GHG reduction vs. baseline

Consider community or city-wide GHG reduction strategies, aligned with green building, renewable energy, and low-carbon planning principles.

Method. (Baseline modeled emissions – actual/projected emissions) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 35

6.1.3.6.2 Transport-related Carbon Emissions

6.1.3.6.2.1
% reduction in VKT or transport emissions

Calculate baseline transport carbon footprint and demonstrate reduction through minimized vehicular travel and modal shift.

Method. (Baseline VKT/emissions – project VKT/emissions) ÷ baseline ×100

Measured value 18.65
6.1.3.6.2.2
Modal shift %

Calculate baseline transport carbon footprint and demonstrate reduction through minimized vehicular travel and modal shift.

Method. (Trips by walking, cycling, transit ÷ total trips) ×100

Measured value 29.73

6.1.3.6.3 Community-scale Carbon Indicators

6.1.3.6.3.1
Per capita GHG emissions (tCO₂e/person·yr)

Track GHG emissions per capita (tons CO₂e/person per year) as a standard metric for comparability.

Method. (Annual total GHG ÷ population)

Measured value 3.81

6.1.3.6.4 Supplementary Metrics

6.1.3.6.4.1
% renewables in energy mix

Where available, include carbon intensity of the energy mix, % of renewable integration, or indirect benefits from WELL health-oriented initiatives.

Method. (Renewable supply ÷ total energy supply) ×100

Measured value 35
6.1.3.7

Waste

Promote sustainable construction and operational waste management at the community scale, including diversion of construction and demolition (C&D) waste, operational recycling, on-site organics treatment, provision of facilities, and performance tracking through standardized metrics.

6.1.3.7.1 Arc Waste Performance Score

6.1.3.7.1.1
Arc Waste Performance Score

Meet minimum Waste Performance Score of 40 (prerequisite) and achieve higher scores up to 100.

Method. Report through Arc (data-driven scoring)

Measured value 55

6.1.3.7.2 Public Waste & Recycling Infrastructure

6.1.3.7.2.1
% of community with access to public recycling bins

Provide public waste and recycling facilities in the community master plan.

Method. (# households or public areas with recycling infrastructure ÷ total) ×100

Measured value 92.5

6.1.3.7.3 Construction & Demolition (C&D) Waste Diversion

6.1.3.7.3.1
% C&D waste diverted

Divert ≥50% of construction and demolition waste (recycle or salvage) as a prerequisite.

Method. (Diverted C&D waste ÷ total C&D waste) ×100

Measured value 56.25

6.1.3.7.4 Operational Waste Diversion (Basic)

6.1.3.7.4.1
% of operational waste diverted

Divert ≥40% of operational waste from landfill/incineration as a prerequisite.

Method. (Diverted MSW ÷ total MSW) ×100

Measured value 40

6.1.3.7.5 Enhanced Operational Waste Diversion

6.1.3.7.5.1
% of operational waste diverted

Divert ≥60% of operational waste for additional credit.

Method. Same as above

Measured value 62.29

6.1.3.7.6 On-site Organic Waste Recycling

6.1.3.7.6.1
Presence of composting facilities

Provide on-site treatment/collection for food and landscaping organic waste (composting).

Method. Verify collection/treatment for organics

Measured value 100

6.1.3.7.7 Source-Segregated Recycling Facilities

6.1.3.7.7.1
% of buildings with segregated bins

Provide segregated bins (recyclables, general, compost) in buildings and public spaces.

Method. (# buildings with bins for recyclables/general/compost ÷ total) ×100

Measured value 85

6.2 Housing

3 pillars

Economic

6.2.1

6.2.1.1

Cost of Living

Assess affordability and household economic burden, including housing costs, mortgage affordability, and general economic accessibility.

6.2.1.1.1 Housing Affordability & Mortgage Burden

6.2.1.1.1.1
Housing cost-to-income ratio

Track affordability of housing and mortgage repayment relative to household income (recognized under LEED ND affordability principles).

Method. (Monthly housing costs ÷ gross household income) ×100

Measured value 32.10
6.2.1.1.1.2
Mortgage repayment burden (%)

Track affordability of housing and mortgage repayment relative to household income (recognized under LEED ND affordability principles).

Method. (Monthly mortgage ÷ household income) ×100

Measured value 29.20
6.2.1.1.1.3
% of households spending >30% income on housing

Track affordability of housing and mortgage repayment relative to household income (recognized under LEED ND affordability principles).

Method. (# households with cost burden ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 30

6.2.1.1.2 Household Economy & Accessibility

6.2.1.1.2.1
Household expenditure index (% income spent on essentials)

Consider affordability of daily living and household economy, though not explicitly codified in BREEAM or Estidama; addressed indirectly in planning guidelines.

Method. (Total essential spending ÷ total income) ×100

Measured value 40
6.2.1.1.2.2
Accessibility of essential services (distance/cost)

Consider affordability of daily living and household economy, though not explicitly codified in BREEAM or Estidama; addressed indirectly in planning guidelines.

Method. Average walking distance or public transport cost to groceries, schools, healthcare

Measured value 337.51
6.2.1.1.2.3
Affordability of transport (cost as % of household income)

Consider affordability of daily living and household economy, though not explicitly codified in BREEAM or Estidama; addressed indirectly in planning guidelines.

Method. (Annual transport costs ÷ household income) ×100

Measured value 14.15

6.2.1.1.3 Economic Indicators

6.2.1.1.3.1
Unemployment rate (%)

Use broader city-scale metrics such as income, unemployment, or GDP per capita as proxies for cost-of-living analysis.

Method. (# unemployed ÷ labor force) ×100

Measured value 4.51
6.2.1.1.3.2
GDP per capita (PPP-adjusted)

Use broader city-scale metrics such as income, unemployment, or GDP per capita as proxies for cost-of-living analysis.

Method. GDP ÷ population

Measured value 3.14
6.2.1.2

Financial Sustainability

Ensure the long-term economic viability of communities by integrating life-cycle financial planning, securing sustainable funding for community assets, maintaining housing affordability, and reducing living costs through sustainable design measures.

6.2.1.2.1 Housing Affordability Ratio

6.2.1.2.1.1
Housing cost-to-income ratio

Maintain median housing costs (purchase or rent) at ≤ 30% of median household income

Method. (Median monthly housing costs ÷ median monthly household income) ×100

Measured value 36.02

6.2.1.2.2 Affordable Housing Provision

6.2.1.2.2.1
% of total units designated as affordable

Allocate a percentage of total housing units as affordable or below-market-rate (source ranges: ~20% of dwellings)

Method. (Affordable units ÷ total units) ×100

Measured value 20.79
6.2.1.2.2.2
Distribution of affordable units across dwelling types

Allocate a percentage of total housing units as affordable or below-market-rate (source ranges: ~20% of dwellings)

Method. (# affordable villas, townhouses, apartments) ÷ total by type

Measured value 1.07

6.2.1.2.3 Household Cost Savings from Sustainability Measures

6.2.1.2.3.1
Annual household savings from energy efficiency (USD/year)

Quantify annual cost savings per household from energy/water efficiency or renewables (range: $___ – $___/year)

Method. (Baseline utility costs – efficient system utility costs)

Measured value 27.16
6.2.1.2.3.2
Annual household savings from water efficiency (USD/year)

Quantify annual cost savings per household from energy/water efficiency or renewables (range: $___ – $___/year)

Method. (Baseline water costs – efficient system water costs)

Measured value 25.85
6.2.1.2.3.3
Renewable energy offset (USD/year)

Quantify annual cost savings per household from energy/water efficiency or renewables (range: $___ – $___/year)

Method. (Renewable generation × utility tariff)

Measured value 25

6.2.1.2.4 Housing Diversity for Affordability

6.2.1.2.4.1
Diversity index of housing types (Shannon/Simpson index)

Provide a mix of housing types (villas, townhouses, apartments) to cater to different income levels

Method. (Proportion of each housing type used in diversity calculation)

Measured value 0.63
6.2.1.2.4.2
% mix of housing typologies (villas, townhouses, apartments)

Provide a mix of housing types (villas, townhouses, apartments) to cater to different income levels

Method. (Units of type ÷ total units) ×100

Measured value 2.94
6.2.1.3

Maintenance Costs

Evaluate lifecycle planning and cost efficiency of assets, focusing on building maintenance, retrofits, and long-term durability across design and community levels.

6.2.1.3.1 Building Maintenance & Retrofits

6.2.1.3.1.1
Annual maintenance cost as % of building replacement value

No explicit measurable parameter in LEED-ND; maintenance considered under general sustainability practices.

Method. (Annual maintenance cost ÷ replacement cost) ×100

Measured value 2.17
6.2.1.3.1.2
% of buildings undergoing retrofits per decade

No explicit measurable parameter in LEED-ND; maintenance considered under general sustainability practices.

Method. (# retrofitted buildings ÷ total buildings) ×100

Measured value 21.46
6.2.1.3.1.3
Maintenance backlog ratio

No explicit measurable parameter in LEED-ND; maintenance considered under general sustainability practices.

Method. (Backlog maintenance cost ÷ annual maintenance budget)

Measured value 7.5

6.2.1.3.2 Lifecycle Asset Management

6.2.1.3.2.1
Existence of lifecycle asset management plan (yes/no)

BREEAM Communities does not set explicit thresholds for maintenance costs but encourages lifecycle asset planning.

Method. Verification of asset management documentation

Measured value —
6.2.1.3.2.2
Lifecycle cost coverage horizon

BREEAM Communities does not set explicit thresholds for maintenance costs but encourages lifecycle asset planning.

Method. Time span of LCC (years)

Measured value 15

6.2.1.3.3 Lifecycle Planning

6.2.1.3.3.1
Average payback period for efficiency retrofits (years)

Estidama Pearl does not provide measurable parameters for maintenance; lifecycle planning is not codified.

Method. (Investment ÷ annual savings)

Measured value 10

6.2.1.3.4 Building Life-Cycle Considerations

6.2.1.3.4.1
% of materials/components with durability ≥30 years

WELL does not directly address long-term maintenance within its scope.

Method. (Durable components ÷ total components) ×100

Measured value 48.81
6.2.1.3.4.2
% of budget allocated to preventative vs. reactive maintenance

WELL does not directly address long-term maintenance within its scope.

Method. (Preventative maintenance budget ÷ total budget) ×100

Measured value 75
6.2.1.4

Economic

Strengthen community economic vitality by achieving high household incomes and strong local economic output, reflecting prosperity and resilience at both household and regional levels.

6.2.1.4.1 Median Household Income

6.2.1.4.1.1
Affordability linkage to housing cost burden

Target ≥150% of the national median household income to demonstrate exemplary performance.

Method. Ratio of median housing cost ÷ median household income

Measured value 30
Social

6.2.2

6.2.2.1

Housing

Provision of affordable, adequate, and diverse housing options that ensure appropriate unit size, affordability, and access to basic amenities while supporting social inclusion and quality of life.

6.2.2.1.1 Unit Size Standard

6.2.2.1.1.1
Minimum internal area per unit type (GIA, m²)

Minimum internal area standards per local or international codes (e.g., LEED acceptable unit size; BREEAM space standards: GIA ≥39 m² for 1 bed/1p, ≥50 m² for 2 bed/2p).

Method. Compare unit sizes against benchmarks

Measured value 51.97

6.2.2.1.2 Housing Affordability

6.2.2.1.2.1
% of population in affordable housing

% of population in affordable housing (ISO 37120 core indicator

Method. (Residents in affordable units ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 21.74
6.2.2.1.2.2
% of units below-market rate

% of population in affordable housing (ISO 37120 core indicator

Method. (Affordable housing units ÷ total units) ×100

Measured value 21.72

6.2.2.1.3 Living Space Per Person

6.2.2.1.3.1
m² of living space per person

Measured in m² per capita

Method. (Total residential GFA ÷ population)

Measured value 17.5
6.2.2.1.3.2
Crowding index

Measured in m² per capita

Method. (Persons ÷ dwelling unit)

Measured value 2.03

6.2.2.1.4 Housing Diversity Index

6.2.2.1.4.1
Housing Diversity Index (Shannon/Simpson)

Minimum ≥0.6 for 1 credit, >0.7 for 2 credits

Method. Index calculation based on distribution of dwelling types

Measured value 0.63
6.2.2.1.4.2
% of developments with ≥3 housing typologies

Minimum ≥0.6 for 1 credit, >0.7 for 2 credits

Method. (Developments with ≥3 typologies ÷ total developments) ×100

Measured value 42.38
6.2.2.2

Health and Well-being

Promote physical and mental health and ensure community well-being by providing access to active living opportunities, high-quality indoor and outdoor environments, green and recreational spaces, and essential health services, while fostering safe, comfortable, and inclusive public spaces, supporting walkability, promoting thermal and acoustic comfort, and safeguarding air, water, and light quality.

6.2.2.2.1 Indoor Environmental Quality

6.2.2.2.1.1
Daylight provision (sDA 300/50%)

Compliance with daylight, ventilation, and low-VOC standards in buildings.

Method. Spatial Daylight Autonomy analysis (% of regularly occupied spaces achieving 300 lux for ≥50% of hours)

Measured value 60
6.2.2.2.1.2
Ventilation rates (L/s per person)

Compliance with daylight, ventilation, and low-VOC standards in buildings.

Method. Compare with ASHRAE 62.1 / Estidama minimums

Measured value 7.80
6.2.2.2.1.3
Low-VOC materials compliance

Compliance with daylight, ventilation, and low-VOC standards in buildings.

Method. % of paints, adhesives, flooring meeting VOC standards

Measured value 90

6.2.2.2.2 Acoustic and Thermal Comfort

6.2.2.2.2.1
Outdoor ambient noise levels (dB LAeq)

Outdoor noise levels ≤55 dB; promote thermal comfort

Method. Noise monitoring at site boundaries

Measured value 53.84
6.2.2.2.2.2
Indoor acoustic comfort (dB / reverberation time)

Outdoor noise levels ≤55 dB; promote thermal comfort

Method. Measurements inside occupied spaces

Measured value 0.28
6.2.2.2.2.3
Thermal comfort (PMV/PPD index)

Outdoor noise levels ≤55 dB; promote thermal comfort

Method. Predicted Mean Vote/Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied

Measured value 75
6.2.2.3

Social Cohesion

Promote inclusive, diverse, and connected communities by providing a mix of housing types and tenures, fostering equitable access to amenities, and creating spaces and opportunities for residents to interact, build trust, and maintain strong social networks.

6.2.2.3.1 Housing Diversity

6.2.2.3.1.1
Housing Diversity Index (Shannon/Simpson)

Range of housing types to cater to different family sizes, incomes, and needs

Method. Diversity index calculation based on dwelling typologies

Measured value 0.63

6.2.2.3.2 Affordable & Social Housing Provision

6.2.2.3.2.1
% of housing units designated as affordable

% of housing units designated as affordable or social housing.

Method. (Affordable units ÷ total housing units) ×100

Measured value 19.31
6.2.2.3.2.2
% of projects with formal affordable housing strategies (yes/no)

% of housing units designated as affordable or social housing.

Method. Verification of inclusion in masterplans

Measured value 1.00
6.2.2.3.2.3
% of units provided as social housing

% of housing units designated as affordable or social housing.

Method. (Social housing units ÷ total housing units) ×100

Measured value 9.71
6.2.2.4

Community Engagement

Foster inclusive, participatory, and culturally respectful community development by engaging residents and stakeholders throughout the planning, design, and post-occupancy phases, ensuring their input shapes the project and preserves cultural heritage.

6.2.2.4.1 Stakeholder Consultation Activities

6.2.2.4.1.1
# of stakeholder/public meetings held

Number of stakeholder/public meetings, charrettes, or workshops held.

Method. Count of formal consultation events (workshops, charrettes, hearings)

Measured value 2.72

6.2.2.4.2 Resident Participation Rate

6.2.2.4.2.1
% of residents/stakeholders consulted

% of residents or stakeholders consulted during design and planning.

Method. (# residents engaged ÷ total resident population) ×100

Measured value 13.75

6.2.2.4.3 Feedback Integration

6.2.2.4.3.1
% of design changes influenced by community feedback

% of design changes or decisions influenced by community feedback.

Method. (# changes linked to feedback ÷ total design changes) ×100

Measured value 25.85
6.2.2.5

Cultural Identity

Preserving and enhancing cultural identity through architecture, planning, and inclusive design, while reflecting local heritage and diversity.

6.2.2.5.1 Local Vernacular & Heritage Design

6.2.2.5.1.1
% of building façades incorporating vernacular design elements

Architectural forms reflect regional character and traditions

Method. Count façades that include recognised vernacular features (e.g. mashrabiya, courtyards, traditional roof forms, local ornamentation) ÷ total façades × 100

Measured value 36.06
6.2.2.5.1.2
Use of local/traditional materials (% by area or cost)

Architectural forms reflect regional character and traditions

Method. Area (m²) or cost (AED) of primary cladding, finishing, ornamentation materials sourced locally or from tradition ÷ total material area or cost ×100

Measured value 40
6.2.2.5.1.3
Resident / Stakeholder Perception of Cultural Identity (%)

Architectural forms reflect regional character and traditions

Method. Survey of residents / users asking “To what extent does this development reflect local architectural character / vernacular heritage?” on a Likert scale (e.g. strongly disagree → strongly agree). Compute % of positive responses (agree/strongly agree)

Measured value 71.25
6.2.2.5.1.4
Compliance with Heritage / Cultural Authority Guidelines

Architectural forms reflect regional character and traditions

Method. % of project design elements (façades, massing, materials) subject to review / approval by local heritage / architectural authorities, and compliance confirmed in permits / review letters

Measured value 85
6.2.2.6

Urbanism

Design compact, mixed-use, and transit-oriented communities with high street connectivity and reliable public transport access to reduce car dependence and enhance walkability.

6.2.2.6.1 Vehicle Dependency (Contextual)

6.2.2.6.1.1
Cars per 1,000 residents

Track cars per capita as a proxy for car reliance and as a counter-indicator to TOD success.

Method. # registered private vehicles ÷ population × 1,000

Measured value 332.15
6.2.2.6.1.2
Vehicle ownership ratio (cars per household)

Track cars per capita as a proxy for car reliance and as a counter-indicator to TOD success.

Method. # private vehicles ÷ # households

Measured value 0.85
6.2.2.6.1.3
Mode share (%) – private car vs. sustainable modes

Track cars per capita as a proxy for car reliance and as a counter-indicator to TOD success.

Method. Share of trips by car, public transport, walking, cycling

Measured value 49.71
6.2.2.6.1.4
Average Vehicle Kilometers Traveled (VKT) per capita per day

Track cars per capita as a proxy for car reliance and as a counter-indicator to TOD success.

Method. Total VKT ÷ total population

Measured value 13.24
6.2.2.6.1.5
Transit accessibility index

Track cars per capita as a proxy for car reliance and as a counter-indicator to TOD success.

Method. % of dwellings within 400 m walk of frequent bus or 800 m of rail/metro

Measured value 75
6.2.2.7

Affordable Housing

Ensure access to housing that is financially attainable, socially inclusive, and diverse, reducing the housing cost burden on households while promoting community stability and equity.

6.2.2.7.1 Housing Cost Burden

6.2.2.7.1.1
Median housing cost-to-income ratio (%)

Median housing costs should not exceed 30% of household income (target).

Method. Median monthly housing cost (rent or mortgage) ÷ median gross monthly household income × 100

Measured value 31.51

6.2.2.7.2 Affordable Housing Provision

6.2.2.7.2.1
% of affordable units provided

Proportion of total housing units designated as affordable (%).

Method. (# of affordable/social units ÷ total units) × 100

Measured value 22.5

6.2.2.7.3 Housing Diversity & Affordability

6.2.2.7.3.1
Housing Diversity Index (0–1)

Provide a mix of housing types, including a defined share of low- and medium-income dwellings, with ≥X% below market rate (Affordability, up to 4 points).

Method. 1 – Σ(share of each housing type²)

Measured value 0.63
6.2.2.7.3.2
% of units allocated to low-/middle-income households

Provide a mix of housing types, including a defined share of low- and medium-income dwellings, with ≥X% below market rate (Affordability, up to 4 points).

Method. (# units priced for low-/middle-income brackets ÷ total units) × 100

Measured value 14.23
6.2.2.7.3.3
Points awarded (0–4)

Provide a mix of housing types, including a defined share of low- and medium-income dwellings, with ≥X% below market rate (Affordability, up to 4 points).

Method. Based on % of affordable units and diversity mix delivered

Measured value 20
6.2.2.8

Green and public space

Ensure equitable provision and access to green and public spaces by setting minimum per-capita thresholds, integrating ecological enhancement, recreational and private outdoor spaces, and promoting contact with nature for health and well-being.

6.2.2.8.1 Private Outdoor Space

6.2.2.8.1.1
% of units with private outdoor space

Ensure ≥ 90% of units have private balconies sized at least 10% of unit floor area (minimum 2 × 3 m) with adequate shading (95% coverage for 3 hours daily).

Method. (# of units with qualifying balcony/private outdoor space ÷ total units) × 100

Measured value 90
6.2.2.8.1.2
Balcony size ratio (% of unit floor area)

Ensure ≥ 90% of units have private balconies sized at least 10% of unit floor area (minimum 2 × 3 m) with adequate shading (95% coverage for 3 hours daily).

Method. Balcony GIA ÷ unit GIA × 100

Measured value 10.69
6.2.2.9

Equity

Promote fairness and inclusion by ensuring environmental justice, affordability, and equitable access to community benefits, with a focus on vulnerable and lower-income populations.

6.2.2.9.1 Affordability & Social Inclusion

6.2.2.9.1.1
% of affordable housing units delivered

Implement strategies that promote affordable living and housing within reach of lower-income residents (Affordability credit, up to 4 points).

Method. (# of affordable/social units ÷ total units) × 100

Measured value 30
6.2.2.9.1.2
% of low-/middle-income households accommodated

Implement strategies that promote affordable living and housing within reach of lower-income residents (Affordability credit, up to 4 points).

Method. (# of low-/middle-income households with access to affordable housing ÷ total households) × 100

Measured value 22.5
6.2.2.9.1.3
Points system for affordability strategies (0–4 pts)

Implement strategies that promote affordable living and housing within reach of lower-income residents (Affordability credit, up to 4 points).

Method. Award points based on % of affordable units and policy measures implemented (e.g., inclusionary zoning, subsidies, rent caps)

Measured value 17.67
6.2.2.9.1.4
Social inclusion participation rate (%)

Implement strategies that promote affordable living and housing within reach of lower-income residents (Affordability credit, up to 4 points).

Method. (# of community facilities and services accessible to low-income groups ÷ total community facilities) × 100

Measured value 75
6.2.2.10

Development physics

Promote urban density, site layout, and visual/ergonomic comfort (light and sound), integrating density strategies with healthy indoor environmental quality.

6.2.2.10.1 Urban Density & Layout

6.2.2.10.1.1
Residential density (du/ha)

Encourage efficient densities and compact site layouts to reduce energy use and land consumption (e.g., BREEAM Communities promotes high-density strategies; Estidama LC-1/LC-2 cover densities and connectivity).

Method. # dwelling units ÷ net developable hectares

Measured value 37.21
6.2.2.10.1.2
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Encourage efficient densities and compact site layouts to reduce energy use and land consumption (e.g., BREEAM Communities promotes high-density strategies; Estidama LC-1/LC-2 cover densities and connectivity).

Method. Total GFA ÷ total site area

Measured value 1.07
6.2.2.10.1.3
Intersection density (intersections/ha)

Encourage efficient densities and compact site layouts to reduce energy use and land consumption (e.g., BREEAM Communities promotes high-density strategies; Estidama LC-1/LC-2 cover densities and connectivity).

Method. # intersections with ≥3 legs ÷ net developable hectares

Measured value 67.5

6.2.2.10.2 Lighting Quality (Circadian & Ergonomic)

6.2.2.10.2.1
Circadian Lighting Metric (Equivalent Melanopic Lux, EML)

Provide circadian-aligned and tunable lighting systems indoors (e.g., WELL requires tunable CCT in the range 2700K–6500K; daylight and color quality maintained at 3000–5000K).

Method. Measure EML at eye level for ≥4 hrs/day in occupied spaces

Measured value 268.51
6.2.2.10.2.2
Tunable lighting CCT range

Provide circadian-aligned and tunable lighting systems indoors (e.g., WELL requires tunable CCT in the range 2700K–6500K; daylight and color quality maintained at 3000–5000K).

Method. Installed systems with tunable correlated color temperature (CCT) range

Measured value 2784.72
6.2.2.10.2.3
Daylight factor / sDA compliance

Provide circadian-aligned and tunable lighting systems indoors (e.g., WELL requires tunable CCT in the range 2700K–6500K; daylight and color quality maintained at 3000–5000K).

Method. Spatial daylight autonomy (sDA 300/50%) or DF ≥2% in occupied spaces

Measured value 59.00

6.2.2.10.3 Acoustic Comfort (Contextual)

6.2.2.10.3.1
Outdoor noise level (dB(A))

Monitor noise levels for ergonomic well-being (ISO 37120 tracks noise as a city indicator; LEED and WELL emphasize indoor sound control qualitatively).

Method. Measure long-term average at project boundary

Measured value 46.70
6.2.2.10.3.2
Indoor ambient noise (NC rating)

Monitor noise levels for ergonomic well-being (ISO 37120 tracks noise as a city indicator; LEED and WELL emphasize indoor sound control qualitatively).

Method. Measured background noise level vs. Noise Criterion (NC)

Measured value 32.5
6.2.2.10.3.3
Reverberation time (RT60)

Monitor noise levels for ergonomic well-being (ISO 37120 tracks noise as a city indicator; LEED and WELL emphasize indoor sound control qualitatively).

Method. Measure reverberation in occupied rooms

Measured value 0.32
Environmental

6.2.3

6.2.3.1

Resource Conservation

Promote sustainable management of water, waste, and related infrastructure, emphasizing stormwater control, green infrastructure, efficient resource use, and equitable service delivery.

6.2.3.1.1 Sanitation & Public Health

6.2.3.1.1.1
% of households with access to improved sanitation

Consider inclusiveness of sanitation and waste services within communities, aligned with WELL Community concepts.

Method. (# households connected to sewerage / improved on-site systems ÷ total households) × 100

Measured value 100
6.2.3.1.1.2
% of households with inclusive solid waste collection

Consider inclusiveness of sanitation and waste services within communities, aligned with WELL Community concepts.

Method. (# households with regular door-to-door waste collection ÷ total households) × 100

Measured value 97.5
6.2.3.1.1.3
% of sanitation facilities accessible to disabled persons

Consider inclusiveness of sanitation and waste services within communities, aligned with WELL Community concepts.

Method. (# of public sanitation facilities meeting accessibility standards ÷ total public facilities) × 100

Measured value 82.5
6.2.3.1.1.4
% of waste diverted from landfill (community scale)

Consider inclusiveness of sanitation and waste services within communities, aligned with WELL Community concepts.

Method. (Recycled + composted + recovered waste ÷ total generated waste) × 100

Measured value 70
6.2.3.2

Energy Efficiency

Promote sustainable energy management at the community scale by reducing per-capita consumption, achieving high building energy performance, integrating renewable energy systems, and mitigating urban heat effects through design and planning to minimize operational energy demand and carbon emissions.

6.2.3.2.1 Building Energy Efficiency & Renewables

6.2.3.2.1.1
% improvement vs. baseline code

Consider building-level energy efficiency and renewable energy adoption where relevant, acknowledging LEED ND references to LEED building credits.

Method. Whole-building energy model per ASHRAE 90.1 (Appendix G) comparing Proposed vs. Baseline

Measured value 22.5
6.2.3.2.1.2
Renewable energy share at building level (%)

Consider building-level energy efficiency and renewable energy adoption where relevant, acknowledging LEED ND references to LEED building credits.

Method. (On-site + contracted renewables credited to building) ÷ annual building energy use ×100

Measured value 12.5

6.2.3.2.2 Urban Heat Reduction

6.2.3.2.2.1
Vegetated/ shaded hardscape (%)

Assess adoption of strategies such as shading, reflective materials, vegetation, and microclimate-responsive design to mitigate urban heat island effects.

Method. (Vegetated + tree-shade + canopy-shade area at noon peak) ÷ total hardscape ×100

Measured value 39.25
6.2.3.2.2.2
Balcony/facade shading factor (community guidance)

Assess adoption of strategies such as shading, reflective materials, vegetation, and microclimate-responsive design to mitigate urban heat island effects.

Method. Modeled shaded time/area on habitable balconies & pedestrian routes

Measured value 75

6.2.3.2.3 Renewable Energy Share

6.2.3.2.3.1
% end-use energy from renewables

Measure percentage of energy consumption supplied from renewable sources.

Method. (Renewable end-use energy ÷ total end-use energy) ×100

Measured value 25
6.2.3.2.3.2
On-site/local renewables (% of demand)

% of total community energy demand met by on-site or local renewable sources.

Method. (On-site + local community renewables) ÷ total demand ×100

Measured value 13.80
6.2.3.3

Energy

Promote efficient energy performance at the building and community scale through demand reduction, passive cooling, renewable integration, refrigerant management, and performance tracking against international benchmarks.

6.2.3.3.1 Arc Energy Performance Score

6.2.3.3.1.1
Arc score (0–100)

Achieve minimum score of 40 (prerequisite) and higher scores up to 100.

Method. Energy performance calculated via Arc platform (normalized EUI vs. baseline, weighted by occupancy, operating hours, and climate)

Measured value 56.64

6.2.3.3.2 Minimum Energy Performance (Prereq)

6.2.3.3.2.1
Modeled energy cost savings vs. ASHRAE 90.1-2007 baseline

Demonstrate ≥12% simulated energy reduction compared to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 baseline.

Method. Whole building simulation (Appendix G methodology)

Measured value 12

6.2.3.3.3 Enhanced Energy Performance

6.2.3.3.3.1
% improvement vs. baseline

Achieve up to 60% reduction beyond baseline for maximum credit (15 pts).

Method. Modeled proposed design vs. ASHRAE 90.1 baseline

Measured value 32.13

6.2.3.3.4 Passive Cooling & Envelope

6.2.3.3.4.1
% reduction in external heat gain

External heat gain reduction of 50% (5 pts); Apply high-SRI roof (≥78) for additional credit (+1 pt).

Method. Energy simulation comparing baseline vs. passive envelope design

Measured value 46.54
6.2.3.3.4.2
High-SRI roof coverage

External heat gain reduction of 50% (5 pts); Apply high-SRI roof (≥78) for additional credit (+1 pt).

Method. % of roof area with SRI ≥78

Measured value 78.69

6.2.3.3.5 On-site Renewable Energy

6.2.3.3.5.1
% of demand met by on-site renewables

Generate on-site renewable energy covering: - 1% = 1 pt - 20% = 8 pts (max).

Method. (On-site renewable generation ÷ total annual building demand) ×100

Measured value 7.64

6.2.3.3.6 Off-site Renewable Energy Purchase

6.2.3.3.6.1
% of demand offset with RECs

Offset ≥20% of building energy demand via renewable energy certificates (RECs).

Method. (RECs purchased ÷ total annual building energy demand) ×100

Measured value 20
6.2.3.4

Waste Treatment

Ensure sustainable waste management through collection, diversion, recycling, construction/operational waste reduction, and reuse of materials, aligned with public health, environmental, and resource conservation goals.

6.2.3.4.1 Construction Waste Diversion

6.2.3.4.1.1
% construction waste diverted

≥ 50% of construction/demolition waste diverted by weight or volume.

Method. (Recycled + reused + recovered C&D waste ÷ total C&D waste generated) ×100

Measured value 68.75

6.2.3.4.2 Operational Waste Diversion

6.2.3.4.2.1
% operational waste diverted

≥ 40% of operational waste diverted by weight or volume.

Method. (Recycled + composted + recovered ÷ total operational waste) ×100

Measured value 45

6.2.3.4.3 Recycled/Modular Materials in Hardscape

6.2.3.4.3.1
% of hardscape modular/recycled

≥ 70% of public hardscape uses modular paving (SRI ≥ 29).

Method. (Area of modular/recycled paving ÷ total hardscape) ×100

Measured value 72.16

6.2.3.4.4 Population Waste Collection Coverage

6.2.3.4.4.1
% population with collection access

% of population with access to waste collection services (core metric).

Method. (# of residents covered by municipal/contracted waste collection ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 96.25

6.2.3.4.5 Waste Recycling Rate

6.2.3.4.5.1
% of municipal waste recycled

% of waste recycled (city-level core metric).

Method. (Recycled municipal waste ÷ total municipal waste) ×100

Measured value 31.25

6.2.3.4.6 General Waste Diversion Programs

6.2.3.4.6.1
# community diversion programs active

Community waste diversion/recycling encouraged, but no numeric targets specified.

Method. Count ongoing recycling/education programs in community

Measured value 4
6.2.3.5

Sustainable Urban Mobility

Ensure high accessibility to public and active transport options while reducing car dependence through integrated transit-oriented design, walkable environments, and supportive mobility amenities.

6.2.3.5.1 Car Ownership Rate

6.2.3.5.1.1
Cars per household (avg.)

Average number of cars per household.

Method. (# registered private vehicles ÷ # households)

Measured value 0.85
6.2.3.5.1.2
Cars per 1,000 residents

Average number of cars per household.

Method. (# registered vehicles ÷ population × 1,000)

Measured value 341.29
6.2.3.5.1.3
% households car-free

Average number of cars per household.

Method. (# households without private vehicles ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 12.85
6.2.3.6

Air Quality

Ensure healthy ambient and indoor air quality at the community scale by addressing outdoor air quality, building ventilation, pollutant limits in car parks, smoking restrictions, and continuous monitoring of indoor pollutants.

6.2.3.6.1 Arc Air Quality Performance Score

6.2.3.6.1.1
Arc Air Quality Score (0–100)

Meet minimum Quality of Life Air Score of 40 (prerequisite) and achieve higher scores up to 100 based on AQI metrics.

Method. Arc platform calculates score using WHO/US-EPA AQI metrics (PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, O₃, NO₂, SO₂, CO)

Measured value 58.28

6.2.3.6.2 Car Park Air Quality

6.2.3.6.2.1
CO concentration

Ventilate enclosed car parks and monitor pollutants: CO ≤ 100 mg/m³; NO₂ ≤ 200 µg/m³; PM₁₀ ≤ 50 µg/m³.

Method. Continuous monitoring (ppm → mg/m³ conversion)

Measured value 45.67
6.2.3.6.2.2
NO₂ concentration

Ventilate enclosed car parks and monitor pollutants: CO ≤ 100 mg/m³; NO₂ ≤ 200 µg/m³; PM₁₀ ≤ 50 µg/m³.

Method. Sensor monitoring

Measured value 91.70
6.2.3.6.2.3
PM₁₀ concentration

Ventilate enclosed car parks and monitor pollutants: CO ≤ 100 mg/m³; NO₂ ≤ 200 µg/m³; PM₁₀ ≤ 50 µg/m³.

Method. Sensor monitoring

Measured value 25.14

6.2.3.6.3 Outdoor Air Intake Quality

6.2.3.6.3.1
Minimum separation distances

Comply with ASHRAE 62.1 requirements for separation of intakes and achieve minimum fresh-air rates.

Method. Distance between outdoor intakes and pollution sources

Measured value 7.53

6.2.3.6.4 WELL Indoor Air Quality Standards

6.2.3.6.4.1
PM₂.₅

Monitor and control PM₂.₅, CO₂, VOCs and maintain pollutant levels below strict thresholds to ensure high IAQ.

Method. Indoor air monitoring

Measured value 7.90
6.2.3.6.4.2
CO₂

Monitor and control PM₂.₅, CO₂, VOCs and maintain pollutant levels below strict thresholds to ensure high IAQ.

Method. IAQ sensors

Measured value 406.72
6.2.3.6.4.3
Total VOCs

Monitor and control PM₂.₅, CO₂, VOCs and maintain pollutant levels below strict thresholds to ensure high IAQ.

Method. Lab IAQ testing

Measured value 125
6.2.3.6.4.4
Formaldehyde

Monitor and control PM₂.₅, CO₂, VOCs and maintain pollutant levels below strict thresholds to ensure high IAQ.

Method. Lab IAQ testing

Measured value 25.53
6.2.3.7

Water

Ensure sustainable water management by reducing indoor and outdoor potable use, implementing efficient practices for cooling and decorative features, providing leak detection and metering, managing stormwater, establishing a community water strategy, tracking per-capita use, integrating the whole water cycle, and ensuring safe drinking water access.

6.2.3.7.1 Indoor Potable Water Use Reduction

6.2.3.7.1.1
% reduction in indoor potable water use vs. baseline

Achieve reductions in indoor potable water consumption versus baseline (e.g., ≥20% reduction prerequisite; ≥40–60% reductions under Estidama)

Method. Calculate baseline fixture water use per LEED/Estidama methodology (EPAct 1992, FEMP, or local plumbing code baselines); compare to design case

Measured value 41.42
6.2.3.8

Pollution

Minimize environmental pollution at the community scale by assessing and controlling air quality, water quality, noise, light, and indoor/outdoor environmental factors, while managing stormwater runoff, construction emissions, and indoor pollutants to protect ecosystems and human health and reduce adverse ecological impacts.

6.2.3.8.1 Air Quality Indicators

6.2.3.8.1.1
PM₂.₅ annual mean

Measure outdoor pollutants such as PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, and compliance with WHO/national air quality standards.

Method. Continuous monitoring (µg/m³)

Measured value 5.62
6.2.3.8.1.2
PM₁₀ daily mean

Measure outdoor pollutants such as PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, and compliance with WHO/national air quality standards.

Method. Monitoring records

Measured value 25.15

6.2.3.8.2 Indoor Environment Factors

6.2.3.8.2.1
Indoor CO₂ concentration

Evaluate air quality, lighting, and indoor environmental quality measures within community buildings.

Method. Continuous monitoring

Measured value 417.69
6.2.3.8.2.2
Daylight factor / sDA

Evaluate air quality, lighting, and indoor environmental quality measures within community buildings.

Method. Daylight modeling or on-site measurement

Measured value 60
6.2.3.8.2.3
Acoustic comfort compliance

Evaluate air quality, lighting, and indoor environmental quality measures within community buildings.

Method. Indoor background noise levels (NC rating)

Measured value 32.5
6.2.3.9

Greenhouse gas release

Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across community operations by managing city-level GHG intensity, building-level carbon performance, renewable energy integration, refrigerant impacts, and long-term GHG reduction strategies.

6.2.3.9.1 GHG Reduction Strategy

6.2.3.9.1.1
% reduction vs. baseline emissions

Implement a greenhouse gas reduction plan demonstrating operational emissions below reference levels, with defined % targets.(Up to 6 points)

Method. (Annual CO₂e avoided ÷ baseline emissions) ×100

Measured value 18.92

6.2.3.9.2 Renewable Energy Fraction

6.2.3.9.2.1
% of demand from renewables

Supply ≥20% of total energy demand from renewable sources.

Method. (Renewable energy delivered ÷ total annual energy demand) ×100

Measured value 14.10

6.3 Urban

3 pillars

Economic

6.3.1

6.3.1.1

Opportunities

Support employment, education, and mixed-income development through planning, skills training, and community resources, ensuring access to jobs and education while addressing unemployment.

6.3.1.1.1 Local Jobs & Skills Programs

6.3.1.1.1.1
% of construction workforce sourced locally

Encourage local employment and training through planning frameworks, e.g., BREEAM SE-17 “Training & Skills” credit requiring community engagement and workforce development.

Method. (# local hires ÷ total construction workforce) ×100

Measured value 29.43
6.3.1.1.1.2
# of apprenticeships/training positions created

Encourage local employment and training through planning frameworks, e.g., BREEAM SE-17 “Training & Skills” credit requiring community engagement and workforce development.

Method. Count of apprenticeships per project

Measured value 1.04
6.3.1.1.1.3
Workforce training investment ($/year)

Encourage local employment and training through planning frameworks, e.g., BREEAM SE-17 “Training & Skills” credit requiring community engagement and workforce development.

Method. Track employer or developer contributions to workforce upskilling

Measured value 1.25

6.3.1.1.2 Mixed-Income Housing & Jobs-Housing Balance

6.3.1.1.2.1
Jobs-to-housing ratio

Promote housing affordability linked with employment opportunities, supported by LEED ND principles on jobs-housing balance and mixed-income development.

Method. (# jobs ÷ # housing units)

Measured value 1.13
6.3.1.1.2.2
% of housing affordable to low- and middle-income groups

Promote housing affordability linked with employment opportunities, supported by LEED ND principles on jobs-housing balance and mixed-income development.

Method. (# affordable units ÷ total units) ×100

Measured value 19.23
6.3.1.1.2.3
% of residents living within 0.5 km of employment center

Promote housing affordability linked with employment opportunities, supported by LEED ND principles on jobs-housing balance and mixed-income development.

Method. GIS analysis of residential vs. job centers

Measured value 55

6.3.1.1.3 Employment & Economic Indicators

6.3.1.1.3.1
Overall unemployment rate (%)

Track unemployment rates, including overall and youth unemployment, as city-scale metrics of opportunity.

Method. (# unemployed ÷ total workforce) ×100

Measured value 6.30
6.3.1.1.3.2
Youth unemployment rate (%)

Track unemployment rates, including overall and youth unemployment, as city-scale metrics of opportunity.

Method. (# unemployed aged 15–24 ÷ total youth workforce) ×100

Measured value 13.72
6.3.1.1.3.3
Median household income relative to national average

Track unemployment rates, including overall and youth unemployment, as city-scale metrics of opportunity.

Method. (Community median ÷ national median) ×100

Measured value 100
6.3.1.2

Economic Growth

Promote sustainable local economic development by creating permanent jobs, fostering diverse and mixed-use economies, supporting local procurement, and enhancing economic resilience through developments that align with community needs and long-term prosperity.

6.3.1.2.1 Mixed-Use Development Provision

6.3.1.2.1.1
% of total GFA allocated to non-residential uses

Include commercial, retail, and office spaces to enable economic activity within the community

Method. (Non-residential GFA ÷ total GFA) ×100

Measured value 13.69
6.3.1.2.1.2
Diversity of commercial typologies

Include commercial, retail, and office spaces to enable economic activity within the community

Method. Count types of non-residential uses (e.g., office, retail, civic, cultural)

Measured value 65
6.3.1.2.1.3
% of residents within 400 m of mixed-use nodes

Include commercial, retail, and office spaces to enable economic activity within the community

Method. GIS analysis of proximity to retail/commercial space

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value — Not analysed

6.3.1.2.2 Commercial Space Provision

6.3.1.2.2.1
Commercial floor area per capita (m²/resident)

Provide commercial floor area in proportion to the resident population (e.g., m² per resident)

Method. (Total commercial GFA ÷ resident population)

Measured value 6.02
6.3.1.2.2.2
Employment density (jobs per 100 residents)

Provide commercial floor area in proportion to the resident population (e.g., m² per resident)

Method. (# jobs within community ÷ population) ×100

Measured value 27.28
6.3.1.2.2.3
Vacancy rate of commercial space (%)

Provide commercial floor area in proportion to the resident population (e.g., m² per resident)

Method. (Vacant commercial floor area ÷ total commercial floor area) ×100

Measured value 5.49
6.3.1.3

Employment

Promote stable employment and economic resilience by targeting low unemployment rates and supporting local workforce development through job creation, training, and apprenticeships.

6.3.1.3.1 Unemployment Rate

6.3.1.3.1.1
Overall unemployment rate (%)

Maintain unemployment within the target range of 3–4% of the population aged 16+.

Method. (# unemployed ÷ labor force aged 16+) ×100

Measured value 3.70
6.3.1.3.1.2
Youth unemployment rate (%)

Maintain unemployment within the target range of 3–4% of the population aged 16+.

Method. (# unemployed aged 15–24 ÷ youth labor force) ×100

Measured value 17.5
6.3.1.3.1.3
Job placement rate (%)

Maintain unemployment within the target range of 3–4% of the population aged 16+.

Method. (# residents securing jobs ÷ total job seekers) ×100

Measured value 73.01

6.3.1.3.2 Local Employment & Skills

6.3.1.3.2.1
% of project value dedicated to local employment/training

Dedicate ≥2% of project value to local workforce initiatives, such as hiring, training, or apprenticeships; supports economic resilience.

Method. (Investment in workforce initiatives ÷ total project value) ×100

Measured value 3.32
6.3.1.3.2.2
Local workforce participation (%)

Dedicate ≥2% of project value to local workforce initiatives, such as hiring, training, or apprenticeships; supports economic resilience.

Method. (# local residents employed ÷ total project workforce) ×100

Measured value 22.20
6.3.1.3.2.3
# of apprenticeships created per project

Dedicate ≥2% of project value to local workforce initiatives, such as hiring, training, or apprenticeships; supports economic resilience.

Method. (# apprenticeships ÷ total workforce) ×100

Measured value 1.07
6.3.1.3.2.4
Training hours per worker per year

Dedicate ≥2% of project value to local workforce initiatives, such as hiring, training, or apprenticeships; supports economic resilience.

Method. Total training hours ÷ total workforce

Measured value 19.22
6.3.1.4

Maintenance

Ensure the long-term durability and hygiene of community assets by incorporating durable design principles and establishing protocols for cleaning and disinfection to maintain occupant health and safety.

6.3.1.4.1 Cleaning & Disinfection Protocols

6.3.1.4.1.1
Cleaning frequency (high-touch surfaces)

Implement advanced cleaning protocols for surfaces, including disinfection practices and use of antimicrobial finishes, to maintain hygiene.

Method. (# cleanings/day of high-touch areas such as door handles, switches, railings)

Measured value 2.40
6.3.1.4.1.2
Approved disinfectant use

Implement advanced cleaning protocols for surfaces, including disinfection practices and use of antimicrobial finishes, to maintain hygiene.

Method. % of disinfectants meeting EPA/WHO standards for safety & efficacy

Measured value 100
6.3.1.4.1.3
Antimicrobial/cleanable surface finishes coverage

Implement advanced cleaning protocols for surfaces, including disinfection practices and use of antimicrobial finishes, to maintain hygiene.

Method. % of high-touch interior surfaces (e.g., counters, flooring, handles) with antimicrobial or easy-clean coatings

Measured value 57.5
6.3.1.4.1.4
Training & PPE compliance for staff

Implement advanced cleaning protocols for surfaces, including disinfection practices and use of antimicrobial finishes, to maintain hygiene.

Method. % of cleaning staff trained in disinfection & provided PPE

Measured value 100
6.3.1.5

Culture

Preserve and enhance cultural heritage and regional identity by integrating local design traditions, protecting heritage assets, and reinforcing cultural continuity at the community scale.

6.3.1.5.1 Regional & Cultural Design

6.3.1.5.1.1
% of new buildings incorporating vernacular features

Incorporate local architectural styles, cultural practices, and materials in building and landscape design (1–2 points).

Method. (Buildings with approved local architectural features ÷ total new buildings) ×100

Measured value 33.28
6.3.1.5.1.2
Use of regional materials in construction (% by cost)

Incorporate local architectural styles, cultural practices, and materials in building and landscape design (1–2 points).

Method. (Cost of local/regional materials ÷ total materials cost) ×100

Measured value 15.33
6.3.1.5.1.3
Integration of cultural elements in public realm

Incorporate local architectural styles, cultural practices, and materials in building and landscape design (1–2 points).

Method. # of cultural symbols, landscape features, or design motifs per hectare

Measured value 2.27

6.3.1.5.2 Heritage & Identity Protection

6.3.1.5.2.1
Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings (% of eligible sites)

Conserve heritage buildings, cultural landmarks, and community identity through planning and design. Up to 3 points available. (Up to 2 points)

Method. (# reused heritage buildings ÷ total eligible heritage buildings) ×100

Measured value 45.63
6.3.1.5.2.2
Cultural programming & events (annual frequency)

Conserve heritage buildings, cultural landmarks, and community identity through planning and design. Up to 3 points available. (Up to 2 points)

Method. (# cultural events, exhibitions, or festivals per year)

Measured value 3.5
6.3.1.6

Equity

Promote fairness and inclusion by ensuring environmental justice, affordability, and equitable access to community benefits, with a focus on vulnerable and lower-income populations.

6.3.1.6.1 Environmental Justice

6.3.1.6.1.1
% of vulnerable populations within 0.5 km of public green/open space

Provide a narrative or distributional analysis plan that demonstrates equitable distribution of environmental burdens and benefits across all community groups.

Method. (# vulnerable population within 500m ÷ total vulnerable population) ×100

Measured value 92.5
6.3.1.6.1.2
% of population exposed to high environmental burdens (PM₂.₅ > WHO limits, noise > 55 dB, traffic proximity)

Provide a narrative or distributional analysis plan that demonstrates equitable distribution of environmental burdens and benefits across all community groups.

Method. (# exposed residents ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 6.30
6.3.1.6.1.3
Community participation in environmental justice planning (% of households engaged)

Provide a narrative or distributional analysis plan that demonstrates equitable distribution of environmental burdens and benefits across all community groups.

Method. (# participating households ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 32.5
Social

6.3.2

6.3.2.1

Safety and Security

Promote safe, resilient, and inclusive communities by addressing crime prevention through design strategies, effective lighting, noise management, physical security, safe mobility, emergency preparedness, and the monitoring of crime-related statistics.

6.3.2.1.1 Crime & Public Safety Performance

6.3.2.1.1.1
Homicide rate (per 100,000 population)

Track violent crime rates (e.g., ≤ 5.5 homicides and ≤ 70 violent crimes per 100,000 population) as a benchmark of community safety.

Method. (# homicides ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 2.05
6.3.2.1.1.2
Violent crime rate (per 100,000 population)

Track violent crime rates (e.g., ≤ 5.5 homicides and ≤ 70 violent crimes per 100,000 population) as a benchmark of community safety.

Method. (# violent crimes ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 248.41
6.3.2.1.1.3
Property crime rate (per 100,000 population)

Track violent crime rates (e.g., ≤ 5.5 homicides and ≤ 70 violent crimes per 100,000 population) as a benchmark of community safety.

Method. (# theft/burglary cases ÷ population ×100,000)

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value — Not analysed

6.3.2.1.2 Safe Mobility & Urban Design

6.3.2.1.2.1
Pedestrian/cyclist dismount distance

Evaluate pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure for safety, ensuring minimal dismount distances (e.g., ≤ 10 m) and applying Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles such as lighting, surveillance, and visibility.

Method. Max uninterrupted safe pathway length before dismount

Measured value 5.44
6.3.2.1.2.2
Street lighting illumination (lux)

Evaluate pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure for safety, ensuring minimal dismount distances (e.g., ≤ 10 m) and applying Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles such as lighting, surveillance, and visibility.

Method. Lux meter readings along sidewalks and cycle tracks

Measured value 50.45
6.3.2.1.2.3
CPTED visibility compliance

Evaluate pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure for safety, ensuring minimal dismount distances (e.g., ≤ 10 m) and applying Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles such as lighting, surveillance, and visibility.

Method. % of public realm areas with clear sightlines, natural surveillance

Measured value 85

6.3.2.1.3 Risk Assessment & Security Planning

6.3.2.1.3.1
Design-based vulnerability reduction

Develop and implement safety and security strategies at the building and community scale, including risk assessments, security plans, and design measures that reduce vulnerability.

Method. # of design strategies applied (access control, barriers, CCTV)

Measured value 2.80

6.3.2.1.4 Emergency Preparedness

6.3.2.1.4.1
Emergency drills (frequency/year)

Integrate protocols for emergency response and preparedness (e.g., evacuation planning, community-level resilience strategies) to reduce risks and enhance recovery capacity.

Method. (# drills conducted ÷ year)

Measured value 2

6.3.2.1.5 Crime Prevention Design (CPTED)

6.3.2.1.5.1
% of public realm with CPTED-compliant design

Integrating environmental design measures (BREEAM, Estidama Pearl) and safety/security strategies to reduce crime risks.

Method. (Compliant area ÷ total public realm) ×100

Measured value 85
6.3.2.1.5.2
Surveillance and visibility measures

Integrating environmental design measures (BREEAM, Estidama Pearl) and safety/security strategies to reduce crime risks.

Method. # of CCTV cameras and visibility-enhancing elements per hectare

Measured value 0.99
6.3.2.2

Mobility &Transport

Enhance sustainable mobility by reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT), improving access to public transport, supporting active transport and recreational facilities, and encouraging mode shift toward low-carbon transport.

6.3.2.2.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

6.3.2.2.1.1
Daily per-capita VMT

Measure daily per-capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as a key mobility performance metric at the city/community level.

Method. (Total vehicle miles traveled ÷ population)

Measured value 19.33
6.3.2.2.1.2
% reduction in VMT vs. baseline

Measure daily per-capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as a key mobility performance metric at the city/community level.

Method. Compare modeled vs. post-occupancy surveys

Measured value 17.58

6.3.2.2.2 Public Transport Access

6.3.2.2.2.1
% dwellings within 350 m of bus/tram stop

Provide transit stops within 350 m of dwellings: frequent bus/tram service (≤15 minutes, 2 points) or metro/rail (3 points).

Method. GIS network analysis of walking distance

Measured value 90
6.3.2.2.2.2
% dwellings within 600 m of rail/metro station

Provide transit stops within 350 m of dwellings: frequent bus/tram service (≤15 minutes, 2 points) or metro/rail (3 points).

Method. GIS analysis

Measured value 52.5
6.3.2.2.2.3
Service frequency (peak hour headway)

Provide transit stops within 350 m of dwellings: frequent bus/tram service (≤15 minutes, 2 points) or metro/rail (3 points).

Method. Timetable analysis

Measured value 13.57

6.3.2.2.3 Active & Recreational Spaces

6.3.2.2.3.1
Open space provision (% GFA or ha/1000 residents)

Integrate outdoor amenity spaces for play and sports, with inclusive design to support all age groups and genders.

Method. (Open space area ÷ population) ×1000

Measured value 2
6.3.2.2.3.2
% of open spaces designed for inclusivity

Integrate outdoor amenity spaces for play and sports, with inclusive design to support all age groups and genders.

Method. (# inclusive spaces ÷ total open spaces) ×100

Measured value 56.25
6.3.2.2.3.3
# of recreational facilities per 1000 residents

Integrate outdoor amenity spaces for play and sports, with inclusive design to support all age groups and genders.

Method. (# facilities ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 1.86

6.3.2.2.4 Cycling & End-of-Trip Facilities

6.3.2.2.4.1
Bicycle parking spaces per building

Provide bicycle facilities, including secure parking and showers/changing facilities (≥1 per gender per 5000 m², max 10 each).

Method. (# spaces ÷ GFA or dwelling units)

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value 0.97 Not analysed
6.3.2.2.4.2
End-of-trip facilities (showers/changing rooms)

Provide bicycle facilities, including secure parking and showers/changing facilities (≥1 per gender per 5000 m², max 10 each).

Method. (# showers/changing rooms per building)

Measured value 1.02
6.3.2.2.4.3
% of streets with cycle infrastructure

Provide bicycle facilities, including secure parking and showers/changing facilities (≥1 per gender per 5000 m², max 10 each).

Method. (Cycle-friendly street length ÷ total street length) ×100

Measured value 50

6.3.2.2.5 Sustainable Transport Mode Share

6.3.2.2.5.1
Mode share by sustainable transport (%)

Encourage modal shift by increasing walking, cycling, and public transport use compared to baseline; linked to non-car mode share targets.

Method. (Trips by walking, cycling, transit ÷ total trips) ×100

Measured value 43.82
6.3.2.2.5.2
% reduction in single-occupancy vehicle trips

Encourage modal shift by increasing walking, cycling, and public transport use compared to baseline; linked to non-car mode share targets.

Method. Compare baseline car mode share vs. project outcomes

Measured value 13.51
6.3.2.3

Education

Promote education and skills development by integrating local training programs, community facilities, and initiatives that enhance access to lifelong learning and workforce readiness.

6.3.2.3.1 Education & Skills Development Programs

6.3.2.3.1.1
% of project value dedicated to training & skills programs

Implement local training, apprenticeship, or skill-building initiatives to support community members and enhance workforce capabilities.

Method. (Investment in training ÷ total project value) ×100

Measured value 1.19
6.3.2.3.1.2
# of apprenticeships / traineeships created

Implement local training, apprenticeship, or skill-building initiatives to support community members and enhance workforce capabilities.

Method. (# apprenticeships ÷ project workforce)

Measured value 1.06
6.3.2.3.1.3
Training participation rate (% workforce trained)

Implement local training, apprenticeship, or skill-building initiatives to support community members and enhance workforce capabilities.

Method. (# trained workers ÷ total workforce) ×100

Measured value 56.25
6.3.2.3.1.4
Annual training hours per worker

Implement local training, apprenticeship, or skill-building initiatives to support community members and enhance workforce capabilities.

Method. (Total training hours ÷ total workforce)

Measured value 18.60

6.3.2.3.2 Community Education Facilities (Optional)

6.3.2.3.2.1
Library/learning centers per 1000 residents

Where feasible, provide or enhance community-level education facilities (schools, libraries, training centers) to support long-term knowledge access and social equity.

Method. (# facilities ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 0.91
6.3.2.3.2.2
Lifelong learning programs offered annually

Where feasible, provide or enhance community-level education facilities (schools, libraries, training centers) to support long-term knowledge access and social equity.

Method. (# courses/workshops per year)

Measured value 3.30
6.3.2.4

Green and public space

Ensure equitable provision and access to green and public spaces by setting minimum per-capita thresholds, integrating ecological enhancement, recreational and private outdoor spaces, and promoting contact with nature for health and well-being.

6.3.2.4.1 Green Space per Capita

6.3.2.4.1.1
Green space per capita (m²/person)

Provide a minimum of 11.25 m² per person (1 point) and 13.5 m² per person (2 points) or equivalent area standards.

Method. (Total public green space area ÷ population)

Measured value 12.38
6.3.2.4.1.2
% of population within 300 m of accessible green space

Provide a minimum of 11.25 m² per person (1 point) and 13.5 m² per person (2 points) or equivalent area standards.

Method. (Residents within 300 m ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 70

6.3.2.4.2 Ecological Enhancement and Native Landscaping

6.3.2.4.2.1
% of landscaped area with native/drought-tolerant species

Plant native or drought-tolerant species on ≥ 50% of landscaped areas (1 point) or ≥ 70% with diverse species for enhanced ecological value (2 points).

Method. (Native/adapted species area ÷ total landscaped area) ×100

Measured value 70
6.3.2.4.2.2
Species diversity index (Shannon/Simpson index)

Plant native or drought-tolerant species on ≥ 50% of landscaped areas (1 point) or ≥ 70% with diverse species for enhanced ecological value (2 points).

Method. Calculate diversity index across planting palette

Measured value 0.65
6.3.2.4.2.3
Irrigation water demand reduction

Plant native or drought-tolerant species on ≥ 50% of landscaped areas (1 point) or ≥ 70% with diverse species for enhanced ecological value (2 points).

Method. % potable water reduction compared to baseline irrigation

Measured value 50.96

6.3.2.4.3 Public Recreational Spaces

6.3.2.4.3.1
Recreational open space per 1000 residents (ha/1000)

Integrate community recreational and communal outdoor spaces such as playgrounds, sports areas, and parks to support active living.

Method. (Recreational open space area ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 2.06
6.3.2.4.3.2
# of recreational facilities per 1000 residents

Integrate community recreational and communal outdoor spaces such as playgrounds, sports areas, and parks to support active living.

Method. (# of playgrounds, sports fields, etc. ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 2

6.3.2.4.4 Access to Nature and Biophilic Design

6.3.2.4.4.1
% of buildings with indoor greenery/planters

Promote mental health and well-being by integrating indoor greenery, daylighting, and visual access to nature.

Method. (# buildings with greenery ÷ total buildings) ×100

Measured value 45.84
6.3.2.4.4.2
Daylighting compliance (% of occupied spaces)

Promote mental health and well-being by integrating indoor greenery, daylighting, and visual access to nature.

Method. % of regularly occupied spaces achieving daylight factor ≥2%

Measured value 60
6.3.2.4.4.3
Visual access to nature (% of occupied spaces)

Promote mental health and well-being by integrating indoor greenery, daylighting, and visual access to nature.

Method. % of workstations/dwelling units with view of greenery

Measured value 73.00
6.3.2.5

Poverty

6.3.2.5.1 Percentage of people with access to clean drinking water

6.3.2.5.1.1
% of population with access to safe drinking water

Method. (# of people with access ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 96.5
6.3.2.5.1.2
Compliance with water quality standards

Method. % of samples meeting WHO/national thresholds for microbial and chemical contaminants

Measured value 100

6.3.2.5.2 Percentage of people with access to sanitation

6.3.2.5.2.1
% of population with access to improved sanitation

Method. (# people with improved sanitation ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 96.5

6.3.2.5.3 Number of homeless people

6.3.2.5.3.1
Homelessness per 100,000 population

Method. (# homeless ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 50
6.3.2.5.3.2
Access to emergency shelter (%)

Method. (# homeless with shelter ÷ total homeless) ×100

Measured value 80

6.3.2.5.4 Percentage of people living below the national poverty level

6.3.2.5.4.1
% of population below national poverty line

Method. (# people below national poverty line ÷ total population) ×100

Measured value 1
6.3.2.5.4.2
% of households with access to social safety nets

Method. (# households receiving social support ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 90
6.3.2.6

Social Cohesion

Promote inclusive, connected communities and strengthen social cohesion by fostering civic engagement, equitable access to facilities and amenities, diverse housing types and tenures, and programs and spaces that support participation, inclusivity, trust, and strong social networks.

6.3.2.6.1 Civic & Community Engagement

6.3.2.6.1.1
Participation rate in civic/community programs (%)

Encourage policies and initiatives for active participation in civic and community life.

Method. (# participants ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 28.64
6.3.2.6.1.2
Frequency of stakeholder/public consultations

Encourage policies and initiatives for active participation in civic and community life.

Method. # consultations/workshops/year

Measured value 1.98

6.3.2.6.2 Access to Community Facilities

6.3.2.6.2.1
% of residents within 350 m of ≥5 facility types

Ensure residents have convenient access (≤350 m) to at least five types of public facilities and programmed communal spaces.

Method. GIS network analysis of residential areas vs. facility distribution

Measured value 90
6.3.2.6.2.2
Facility mix index (variety of facility types)

Ensure residents have convenient access (≤350 m) to at least five types of public facilities and programmed communal spaces.

Method. Count of facility types available per 1000 residents

Measured value 5.05

6.3.2.6.3 Community Development & Events

6.3.2.6.3.1
# of community events/year

Promote community building through stakeholder engagement, organized events, and support for local programs.

Method. Total organized cultural/social events annually

Measured value 3.99
6.3.2.6.3.2
Resident participation in events (% of population)

Promote community building through stakeholder engagement, organized events, and support for local programs.

Method. (# participants ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 28.68

6.3.2.6.4 Inclusive Engagement Programs

6.3.2.6.4.1
% of community programs addressing inclusivity/equity

Encourage initiatives for social equity, inclusiveness, and wellbeing via community-driven policies and programs.

Method. (# inclusive programs ÷ total programs) ×100

Measured value 36.47
6.3.2.6.4.2
Representation of vulnerable groups in planning processes (%)

Encourage initiatives for social equity, inclusiveness, and wellbeing via community-driven policies and programs.

Method. (# vulnerable group reps ÷ total participants) ×100

Measured value 14.16

6.3.2.6.5 Community Spaces for Interaction

6.3.2.6.5.1
# of community centers/majlis per 1000 residents

Availability of community centers, majlis, or other public gathering places.

Method. (# centers ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 0.92
6.3.2.6.5.2
% of residents within 500 m of a community space

Availability of community centers, majlis, or other public gathering places.

Method. GIS network analysis

Measured value 100

6.3.2.6.6 Community Events & Activities

6.3.2.6.6.1
Event diversity index

Number of community events or programs per year that foster interaction.

Method. Count distinct event categories (sports, cultural, educational)

Measured value 3

6.3.2.6.7 Diversity Index

6.3.2.6.7.1
Simpson/Shannon diversity index

Measurement of social mix (age, income, ethnicity) using indices such as Simpson or Shannon diversity index.

Method. Statistical diversity index applied to population demographics

Measured value 0.65

6.3.2.6.8 Resident Connection & Trust

6.3.2.6.8.1
% of residents knowing neighbors

% of residents who know their neighbors, report good community relations, or score high on a social trust index

Method. Survey results

Measured value 73.75
6.3.2.6.8.2
% reporting high trust/community satisfaction

% of residents who know their neighbors, report good community relations, or score high on a social trust index

Method. Community well-being surveys

Measured value 80
6.3.2.7

Urban diversity

Promote diverse and inclusive communities by encouraging land-use mix, cultural diversity, and access to varied amenities that support social vibrancy and reduce travel needs.

6.3.2.7.1 Land-Use Mix & Proximity

6.3.2.7.1.1
# of distinct land uses within ¼ mile (400 m) of dwellings

Ensure residential areas are within walking distance of diverse land uses; at least 6–10 different uses within ¼ mile of 50% of dwellings earns 1–2 points.

Method. GIS spatial analysis of residential parcels and nearby land uses

Measured value 6.58
6.3.2.7.1.2
% of dwellings within 400 m of ≥6 uses

Ensure residential areas are within walking distance of diverse land uses; at least 6–10 different uses within ¼ mile of 50% of dwellings earns 1–2 points.

Method. (Dwellings meeting criteria ÷ total dwellings) ×100

Measured value 65
6.3.2.7.1.3
Diversity index of land-use distribution

Ensure residential areas are within walking distance of diverse land uses; at least 6–10 different uses within ¼ mile of 50% of dwellings earns 1–2 points.

Method. Calculate Shannon Index for land-use balance

Measured value 0.65

6.3.2.7.2 Cultural & Social Diversity

6.3.2.7.2.1
% of cultural/social facilities per 1000 residents

Encourage community design that integrates cultural diversity and supports a mix of uses and programs, fostering inclusiveness and variety in daily life.

Method. (# cultural/social facilities ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 0.92
6.3.2.7.2.2
Representation of different cultural groups in community programs

Encourage community design that integrates cultural diversity and supports a mix of uses and programs, fostering inclusiveness and variety in daily life.

Method. (# cultural groups represented ÷ total programs) ×100

Measured value 3.05
6.3.2.7.2.3
Inclusiveness index (perception of cultural/social inclusivity)

Encourage community design that integrates cultural diversity and supports a mix of uses and programs, fostering inclusiveness and variety in daily life.

Method. % of surveyed residents reporting inclusiveness in community life

Measured value 73.75
6.3.2.7.2.4
Diversity index (social mix by ethnicity/income/age)

Encourage community design that integrates cultural diversity and supports a mix of uses and programs, fostering inclusiveness and variety in daily life.

Method. Calculate Simpson/Shannon Index

Measured value 0.65
6.3.2.8

Urban density

None of the Codes have addressed Urban density, lecturer dimensions will be used as they mentioned

6.3.2.8.1 Population Density

6.3.2.8.1.1
Net residential density (dwelling units/ha)

Method. (Total dwelling units ÷ net residential land area)

Measured value 20.56
6.3.2.8.1.2
Jobs-to-residents ratio (employment density balance)

Method. (# jobs in community ÷ total residents)

Measured value 0.87

6.3.2.8.2 Adequate supporting structures for the populace and building density

6.3.2.8.2.1
Infrastructure capacity compliance

Method. Compare actual demand (water, energy, transport) vs. design capacity

Measured value —
6.3.2.8.2.2
Community facility provision ratio

Method. (# schools, clinics, community centers ÷ population) ×1000

Measured value 0.99
6.3.2.8.2.3
Open space provision per capita (m²/person)

Method. (Public open space ÷ total population)

Measured value 10.54
6.3.2.8.2.4
Transport capacity adequacy

Method. (Public transport seats available ÷ peak-hour demand) ×100

Measured value 0.56
6.3.2.9

Urban design

Promote high-quality, walkable urban design that ensures community connectivity, proximity to amenities, and pedestrian-friendly layouts supporting daily life.

6.3.2.9.1 Walkable Access to Amenities

6.3.2.9.1.1
% of dwellings within 800 m of ≥3 key amenities

Ensure that a significant share of dwellings (e.g., 90%) are within 800 m of key amenities, such as shops, schools, or community facilities, to support walkability.

Method. GIS network analysis of residential parcels and amenities

Measured value 78.75
6.3.2.9.1.2
% of dwellings within 400 m of neighborhood-scale amenities

Ensure that a significant share of dwellings (e.g., 90%) are within 800 m of key amenities, such as shops, schools, or community facilities, to support walkability.

Method. GIS analysis of smaller-scale facilities (shops, playgrounds, bus stops)

Measured value 55
6.3.2.9.1.3
Amenity diversity index

Ensure that a significant share of dwellings (e.g., 90%) are within 800 m of key amenities, such as shops, schools, or community facilities, to support walkability.

Method. Count distinct types of amenities within walking distance (retail, healthcare, education, recreation)

Measured value 6.54
6.3.2.9.1.4
Perceived walkability (resident surveys)

Ensure that a significant share of dwellings (e.g., 90%) are within 800 m of key amenities, such as shops, schools, or community facilities, to support walkability.

Method. % of residents rating local walkability as “good” or “excellent”

Measured value 60
6.3.2.10

Accessibility

Ensure inclusive access to amenities, transport facilities, and interior circulation by promoting barrier-free design, universal access standards, and active mobility infrastructure.

6.3.2.10.1 Proximity to Amenities

6.3.2.10.1.1
% of dwellings within 350 m of ≥5 facility types

Provide safe pedestrian access within 350 m to at least five public facility types.

Method. GIS network analysis of residential parcels vs. public facility locations

Measured value 83.29
6.3.2.10.1.2
Amenity diversity index (types within 350 m)

Provide safe pedestrian access within 350 m to at least five public facility types.

Method. Count distinct amenity categories (education, health, retail, recreation, civic)

Measured value 5.00
6.3.2.10.1.3
Safe pedestrian connectivity

Provide safe pedestrian access within 350 m to at least five public facility types.

Method. % of routes with sidewalks and crossings compliant with design standards

Measured value 90

6.3.2.10.2 Active Transport Amenities

6.3.2.10.2.1
Bicycle parking spaces per 100 occupants

Include bicycle parking and end-of-trip facilities such as showers and changing rooms to encourage sustainable commuting.

Method. (# bike spaces ÷ occupant load ×100)

Measured value 5.30
6.3.2.10.2.2
End-of-trip facilities (showers/changing rooms)

Include bicycle parking and end-of-trip facilities such as showers and changing rooms to encourage sustainable commuting.

Method. (# showers/changing rooms per building)

Measured value 1.06
6.3.2.10.2.3
% of buildings providing bicycle facilities

Include bicycle parking and end-of-trip facilities such as showers and changing rooms to encourage sustainable commuting.

Method. (# buildings with facilities ÷ total buildings) ×100

Measured value 82.66

6.3.2.10.3 Interior Circulation & Walkability

6.3.2.10.3.1
Wayfinding and signage adequacy

Promote accessible interior design by ensuring stairs are usable to at least the first three floors and pathways support universal movement.

Method. % of facilities with accessible wayfinding systems (visual, tactile, auditory)

Measured value 90
6.3.2.11

Community Engagement

Foster inclusive, participatory, and culturally respectful community development by engaging residents and stakeholders throughout the planning, design, and post-occupancy phases, ensuring their input shapes the project and preserves cultural heritage.

6.3.2.11.1 Community Engagement Plan

6.3.2.11.1.1
Stages of engagement completed

Existence of a formal community engagement strategy covering pre-design, design, and post-occupancy stages.

Method. % of project stages (pre-design, design, post-occupancy) with documented engagement

Measured value 2.40
6.3.2.11.1.2
% of households/stakeholders consulted

Existence of a formal community engagement strategy covering pre-design, design, and post-occupancy stages.

Method. (# households consulted ÷ total households) ×100

Measured value 37.44

6.3.2.11.2 Cultural Heritage Inclusion

6.3.2.11.2.1
% of public realm featuring traditional/local design elements

Incorporation of cultural heritage elements or traditional design features in the project (yes/no)

Method. (Public realm with cultural motifs ÷ total public realm) ×100

Measured value 25.68

6.3.2.11.3 Ongoing Community Activities

6.3.2.11.3.1
# of community events per year

Number of community events/year, volunteer participation rate, or existence of community committees

Method. Count of cultural, social, or recreational events annually

Measured value 4.06
6.3.2.11.3.2
Volunteer participation rate (%)

Number of community events/year, volunteer participation rate, or existence of community committees

Method. (# volunteers ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 9.34

6.3.2.11.4 Education & Awareness Programs

6.3.2.11.4.1
# of sustainability workshops/year

Provision of sustainability workshops, education programs, or communication channels for residents.

Method. Count workshops or sessions provided

Measured value 2.51
6.3.2.11.4.2
% of residents participating in programs

Provision of sustainability workshops, education programs, or communication channels for residents.

Method. (# participants ÷ total residents) ×100

Measured value 11.25
6.3.2.12

Quality of Life

Enhance residents’ well-being, comfort, and quality of life by ensuring equitable access to amenities, services, and essential community facilities, while providing green and public spaces, cultural, leisure, and educational opportunities, and fostering walkable, safe, and connected communities within a healthy living environment.

6.3.2.12.1 Proximity to Amenities & Services

6.3.2.12.1.1
% of dwellings within 300–500 m of ≥3 amenities (parks, schools, healthcare, community facilities)

% of dwellings within a defined walking distance (300–500 m) of parks, schools, healthcare, or community facilities.

Method. GIS network analysis of residential parcels vs. amenities

Measured value 78.75

6.3.2.12.2 Walkability & Connectivity

6.3.2.12.2.1
Walk Score® or equivalent index

Walk score or equivalent index measuring pedestrian access and connectivity.

Method. GIS-based scoring system of amenities and connectivity

Measured value 73.75
6.3.2.12.2.2
Intersection density per km²

Walk score or equivalent index measuring pedestrian access and connectivity.

Method. (# intersections ÷ land area km²)

Measured value 81.60

6.3.2.12.3 Access to Green Space

6.3.2.12.3.1
Green space per capita (m²/person)

m² of public green space per person or % of dwellings within a set distance of open spaces.

Method. (Total public green space ÷ population)

Measured value 10.13
6.3.2.12.3.2
% of dwellings within 300 m of a public park/open space

m² of public green space per person or % of dwellings within a set distance of open spaces.

Method. GIS buffer analysis

Measured value 81.90

6.3.2.12.4 Community Satisfaction

6.3.2.12.4.1
% of residents satisfied with their community

Percentage of residents satisfied with their local area, amenities, and services (via surveys)

Method. Resident surveys

Measured value 73.75
6.3.2.12.4.2
% of residents reporting high trust in neighbors

Percentage of residents satisfied with their local area, amenities, and services (via surveys)

Method. Surveys

Measured value 60.70

6.3.2.12.5 Health & Wellbeing

6.3.2.12.5.1
Average life satisfaction score (1–10)

Average self-reported life satisfaction score or similar subjective well-being measure.

Method. Resident surveys (Likert scale)

Measured value 7.38
6.3.2.12.5.2
% self-reporting good health

Average self-reported life satisfaction score or similar subjective well-being measure.

Method. Surveys

Measured value 74.06

6.3.2.12.6 Safety & Security

6.3.2.12.6.1
Violent crime rate (per 100,000)

Crime rate statistics or % of residents who feel safe in the community.

Method. (# violent crimes ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 52.5
6.3.2.12.6.2
% of residents who feel safe

Crime rate statistics or % of residents who feel safe in the community.

Method. Resident surveys

Measured value 87.5

6.3.2.12.7 Mobility & Commute Times

6.3.2.12.7.1
Average one-way commute time (minutes)

Average commuting time for residents to key destinations.

Method. Household travel surveys; transport data

Measured value 26.48
6.3.2.12.7.2
% of residents commuting by sustainable modes

Average commuting time for residents to key destinations.

Method. (# residents using non-car modes ÷ total commuters) ×100

Measured value 45

6.3.2.12.8 Green and Open Space Provision

6.3.2.12.8.1
Public open space per capita (m²/person)

Defined green/open space per capita with accessible public amenities

Method. (Open space ÷ population)

Measured value 11.88
6.3.2.12.8.2
% of open spaces with amenities (seating, play, sport)

Defined green/open space per capita with accessible public amenities

Method. (# of equipped open spaces ÷ total open spaces) ×100

Measured value 79.29

6.3.2.12.9 Community Facilities Access

6.3.2.12.9.1
Walking distance reduction compared to UPC standard (%)

Reduced walking distance (≥25% shorter than UPC standards) to healthcare, education, and leisure services

Method. (UPC standard distance – actual distance) ÷ UPC standard

Measured value 26.51
6.3.2.12.9.2
% of residents within 500 m of healthcare, education & leisure

Reduced walking distance (≥25% shorter than UPC standards) to healthcare, education, and leisure services

Method. GIS accessibility analysis

Measured value 100

6.3.2.12.10 Cultural and Educational Amenities

6.3.2.12.10.1
# of libraries/cultural centers per 100,000 residents

Cultural institutions, libraries, and sports facilities per capita as measures of community cultural and leisure access

Method. (# facilities ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 0.95
6.3.2.12.10.2
# of sports/leisure facilities per 1000 residents

Cultural institutions, libraries, and sports facilities per capita as measures of community cultural and leisure access

Method. (# facilities ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 1.93
6.3.2.13

Health and Well-being

Promote holistic physical, mental, and social well-being by ensuring clean air, pollutant control, and waterborne disease prevention, with equitable access to active living, green and recreational spaces, quality environments, and health services, while supporting walkability, thermal and acoustic comfort, safe inclusive public spaces, and safeguarding air, water, and light quality in line with wellness frameworks.

6.3.2.13.1 Access to Recreation

6.3.2.13.1.1
% of residents within 500–800 m of a park/sports facility

% of residents within a defined distance of parks, sports facilities, or recreation areas.

Method. GIS buffer analysis of residences to nearest recreation facility

Measured value 84.06
6.3.2.13.1.2
Recreational space provision (ha/1000 residents)

% of residents within a defined distance of parks, sports facilities, or recreation areas.

Method. (Recreational space ÷ population ×1000)

Measured value 2.08

6.3.2.13.2 Outdoor Environmental Comfort

6.3.2.13.2.1
Thermal comfort compliance (UTCI/PMV index)

Compliance with shading, thermal comfort, and air quality standards in public spaces.

Method. Field measurements; thermal modeling

Measured value 32.00
6.3.2.13.2.2
% of shaded seating areas in public realm

Compliance with shading, thermal comfort, and air quality standards in public spaces.

Method. (# shaded seating ÷ total seating) ×100

Measured value 72.03
6.3.2.13.2.3
Outdoor AQI compliance

Compliance with shading, thermal comfort, and air quality standards in public spaces.

Method. % of days with AQI ≤100

Measured value 100

6.3.2.13.3 Healthcare Access

6.3.2.13.3.1
% of residents within 1 km of primary healthcare facility

Distance to nearest healthcare facility or % of residents within a set range.

Method. GIS network analysis

Measured value 83.06
6.3.2.13.3.2
Distance to nearest hospital (km)

Distance to nearest healthcare facility or % of residents within a set range.

Method. GIS buffer analysis

Measured value 3.27

6.3.2.13.4 Physical Health Indicators

6.3.2.13.4.1
Adult obesity rate (%)

Metrics such as adult obesity rate (%) or % of residents meeting recommended physical activity levels.

Method. (# obese adults ÷ total adults) ×100

Measured value 2.5
6.3.2.13.4.2
% of residents meeting physical activity recommendations

Metrics such as adult obesity rate (%) or % of residents meeting recommended physical activity levels.

Method. Surveys; health records

Measured value 60.79

6.3.2.13.5 Mental Well-being Indicators

6.3.2.13.5.1
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)

Use of recognized indices (e.g., WHO-5 or Warwick-Edinburgh scores) to measure subjective well-being.

Method. Survey (14/7 items; 14–70 score)

Measured value 46.77

6.3.2.13.6 Green and Recreational Access

6.3.2.13.6.1
Green/open space per capita (m²/person)

Minimum 11.25 m² green/open space per person; ≥90% of residents within 800 m of a park

Method. (Total open/green space ÷ population)

Measured value 11.88
6.3.2.13.6.2
% of residents within 800 m of a park

Minimum 11.25 m² green/open space per person; ≥90% of residents within 800 m of a park

Method. GIS buffer analysis

Measured value 67.5

6.3.2.13.7 Pedestrian Connectivity and Shading

6.3.2.13.7.1
Direct Route Index (DRI)

Direct Route Index <1.5; shaded resting areas every 350 m along primary walkways

Method. (Shortest path ÷ straight-line distance)

Measured value 1.58
6.3.2.13.7.2
Resting/shaded seating frequency

Direct Route Index <1.5; shaded resting areas every 350 m along primary walkways

Method. Distance between shaded rest areas (m)

Measured value 281.91

6.3.2.13.8 Active Recreation Provision

6.3.2.13.8.1
% of population with access to sports facilities within 500 m

Outdoor sports/recreation areas accessible to all groups (women, children); showers/changing within 350 m

Method. GIS accessibility analysis

Measured value 81.52

6.3.2.13.9 Healthcare Accessibility

6.3.2.13.9.1
Hospital beds per 100,000 residents

Hospital beds and physicians per 100,000 residents as proxy measures of access to health services

Method. (# beds ÷ population ×100,000)

Measured value 218.44
6.3.2.13.9.2
Physicians per 100,000 residents

Hospital beds and physicians per 100,000 residents as proxy measures of access to health services

Method. (# physicians ÷ population ×100,000)

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value — Not analysed

6.3.2.13.10 Indoor Air Quality & Healthy Ventilation

6.3.2.13.10.1
Ventilation rates (l/s per person)

Implement a Construction IAQ Management Plan and ensure adequate ventilation rates to maintain indoor environmental quality.

Method. Mechanical system commissioning

Measured value 105.88

6.3.2.13.11 Smoking Control

6.3.2.13.11.1
Smoke-free buffer zones (m)

Prohibit smoking indoors and provide smoke-free zones of at least 25 m around entrances and outdoor air intakes.

Method. Distance from entrances/air intakes

Measured value 22.40

6.3.2.13.12 Active Living & Recreation

6.3.2.13.12.1
Length of walking/cycling routes per 1000 residents (km)

Incorporate health-promoting community design features such as walkways, bike paths, parks, and recreation facilities.

Method. Total km ÷ population ×1000

Measured value 1.5
6.3.2.13.12.2
% of buildings with internal active design (stairs, signage, circulation)

Incorporate health-promoting community design features such as walkways, bike paths, parks, and recreation facilities.

Method. (# buildings with active features ÷ total buildings) ×100

Measured value 68.80

6.3.2.13.13 Mental Health & Well-being

6.3.2.13.13.1
% of residents within 300 m of a green/blue space

Provide mental health support resources and access to green spaces to reduce stress and enhance psychological well-being.

Method. GIS buffer analysis

Measured value 84.11
Environmental

6.3.3

6.3.3.1

Land Use

Promote sustainable land use practices by prioritizing redevelopment of previously developed or brownfield sites, conserving agricultural land, remediating contamination, and enhancing ecological value with native vegetation.

6.3.3.1.1 Agricultural Land Conservation

6.3.3.1.1.1
Farmland replacement ratio

Replace impacted farmland at a 2:1 ratio with equivalent urban agriculture, rooftop, or community farming.

Method. (Area of new urban agriculture ÷ area of impacted farmland)

Measured value 1.78
6.3.3.1.1.2
% of site dedicated to community/rooftop farming

Replace impacted farmland at a 2:1 ratio with equivalent urban agriculture, rooftop, or community farming.

Method. (Urban agriculture area ÷ total site area) ×100

Measured value 2

6.3.3.1.2 Brownfield Site Identification

6.3.3.1.2.1
% of site area classified as brownfield

Document whether the site is located on a brownfield (present/absent).

Method. (Brownfield area ÷ total site area) ×100

Measured value 50.78

6.3.3.1.3 Reuse of Developed Land

6.3.3.1.3.1
% of site area previously developed

Demonstrate that ≥75% of the site area is previously developed.

Method. (Previously developed area ÷ total site area) ×100

Measured value 76.34
6.3.3.1.3.2
% of new development on infill sites

Demonstrate that ≥75% of the site area is previously developed.

Method. (Infill site area ÷ total new development area) ×100

Measured value 45.99

6.3.3.1.4 Ecological Enhancement

6.3.3.1.4.1
Species diversity index (Shannon/Simpson)

Plant native or drought-tolerant vegetation covering: - ≥50% of landscaped area with ≥5 species (1 point) - ≥70% of landscaped area with ≥10 species (2 points)

Method. Calculate biodiversity index of planted species

Measured value 0.53

6.3.3.1.5 Green Star Brownfield/Urban Priority

6.3.3.1.5.1
% of development on brownfield sites

Prioritize development on previously developed or brownfield land: - ≥50% of site on brownfield; OR - 100% of site within urban growth boundary.

Method. (Brownfield area ÷ total site area) ×100

Measured value 54.05
6.3.3.2

Energy

Promote efficient energy performance at the building and community scale through demand reduction, passive cooling, renewable integration, refrigerant management, and performance tracking against international benchmarks.

6.3.3.2.1 Refrigerant Global Warming Potential (GWP)

6.3.3.2.1.1
Weighted average refrigerant GWP

Weighted average refrigerant GWP ≤ 10 (1 pt).

Method. (Σ (GWP × refrigerant charge) ÷ Σ refrigerant charge)

Measured value 37.02

6.3.3.2.2 Peak Electricity Demand Reduction

6.3.3.2.2.1
% reduction in peak electricity demand

Reduce onsite peak demand and/or increase renewables/storage integration. (ex: documented reduction % = up to 2 pts.)

Method. (Baseline peak kW – reduced peak kW ÷ baseline peak kW) ×100

Measured value 14.79
6.3.3.2.2.2
% of peak demand met with on-site renewable/storage

Reduce onsite peak demand and/or increase renewables/storage integration. (ex: documented reduction % = up to 2 pts.)

Method. (On-site renewables + storage supply ÷ peak demand) ×100

Measured value 13.75
6.3.3.3

Climate Change

Evaluate and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at both the community and project scale, focusing on GHG intensity and strategic reduction measures.

6.3.3.3.1 GHG Intensity (City Level)

6.3.3.3.1.1
GHG emissions per capita (tCO₂e/person/year)

Measure greenhouse gas emissions per unit of GDP.

Method. (Total GHG ÷ population)

Measured value 5.23

6.3.3.3.2 GHG Reduction Strategy

6.3.3.3.2.1
% reduction in operational GHG emissions compared to baseline

Develop and implement strategies to lower operational GHG emissions versus a defined reference baseline.

Method. (Baseline emissions – actual emissions ÷ baseline emissions) ×100

Measured value 19.56
6.3.3.3.2.2
% of energy demand met with renewables

Develop and implement strategies to lower operational GHG emissions versus a defined reference baseline.

Method. (Renewable energy consumption ÷ total energy consumption) ×100

Measured value 36.13
6.3.3.3.2.3
Carbon offset mechanisms (% of residual emissions)

Develop and implement strategies to lower operational GHG emissions versus a defined reference baseline.

Method. (Offsets purchased ÷ residual GHG emissions) ×100

Measured value 15
6.3.3.4

Greenhouse gas release

Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across community operations by managing city-level GHG intensity, building-level carbon performance, renewable energy integration, refrigerant impacts, and long-term GHG reduction strategies.

6.3.3.4.1 Citywide GHG Intensity

6.3.3.4.1.1
GHG intensity (tCO₂e per unit GDP)

Measure GHG emissions per GDP (GHG intensity).

Method. (Total annual GHG emissions ÷ City GDP)

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value — Not analysed
6.3.3.4.1.2
GHG emissions per capita (tCO₂e/person/year)

Measure GHG emissions per GDP (GHG intensity).

Method. (Total annual GHG ÷ population)

Measured value 4.72

6.3.3.4.2 Low-GWP Refrigerants

6.3.3.4.2.1
Weighted average refrigerant GWP

Ensure average refrigerant Global Warming Potential (GWP) ≤10. (1 point)

Method. (Σ (GWP × refrigerant charge) ÷ Σ refrigerant charge)

Measured value 30.75
6.3.3.5

Carbon Footprint Reduction

Reduce operational and embodied greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy integration, low-carbon mobility, and carbon offset measures, aiming for long-term net-zero or climate-positive outcomes.

6.3.3.5.1 Operational CO₂ Emissions per Capita

6.3.3.5.1.1
Operational CO₂ per capita (tCO₂/person/year)

Annual tonnes of CO₂/person for community operations (energy, transport).

Method. (Total operational CO₂ ÷ total residents)

Measured value 5.45
6.3.3.5.1.2
Scope coverage (Scopes 1, 2, 3)

Annual tonnes of CO₂/person for community operations (energy, transport).

Method. Verification of emissions categories included

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value — Not analysed

6.3.3.5.2 Building CO₂ Intensity

6.3.3.5.2.1
Residential CO₂ intensity (kgCO₂/m²/year)

kgCO₂/m²/year for residential and non-residential buildings.

Method. Annual CO₂ ÷ GFA (residential)

Measured value 30.62
6.3.3.5.2.2
Non-residential CO₂ intensity (kgCO₂/m²/year)

kgCO₂/m²/year for residential and non-residential buildings.

Method. Annual CO₂ ÷ GFA (commercial, office)

Not analysed (no usable survey answers)

Measured value — Not analysed

6.3.3.5.3 % CO₂ Reduction vs Baseline

6.3.3.5.3.1
% reduction in operational CO₂ vs baseline

Reduction compared to a standard or code-compliant reference case.

Method. (Baseline CO₂ – Actual CO₂ ÷ Baseline CO₂) ×100

Measured value 15

6.3.3.5.4 Renewable Energy Share

6.3.3.5.4.1
% of energy demand met by renewables

% of total energy demand met by on-site or local renewable sources.

Method. (Renewable energy ÷ total energy demand) ×100

Measured value 35.69
6.3.3.5.4.2
On-site vs. off-site renewables ratio

% of total energy demand met by on-site or local renewable sources.

Method. (On-site renewables ÷ total renewables) ×100

Measured value 36.69

6.3.3.5.5 Carbon Offsetting / Neutrality Measures

6.3.3.5.5.1
% of residual CO₂ emissions offset

Presence and scale of carbon offsets or neutralization actions.

Method. (Offsets ÷ residual CO₂ emissions) ×100

Measured value 17.13

6.3.3.5.6 Climate Resilience Planning

6.3.3.5.6.1
% of infrastructure with climate risk assessments

Existence of adaptation plans supporting sustained low-carbon performance.

Method. (# infrastructure assets assessed ÷ total assets) ×100

Measured value 83.50
6.3.3.6

Biodiversity and Green Spaces

Protect and enhance natural habitats while ensuring equitable access to green spaces, integrating biodiversity conservation into urban design, and promoting daily human–nature interaction.

6.3.3.6.1 Habitat Protection / Restoration

6.3.3.6.1.1
Habitat preserved/restored (m² or ha)

Area of ecologically significant habitat preserved or restored (m² or hectares).

Method. GIS land surveys; ecological studies

Measured value 10.30
6.3.3.6.1.2
% of ecologically significant habitat conserved

Area of ecologically significant habitat preserved or restored (m² or hectares).

Method. (Habitat conserved ÷ total site area) ×100

Measured value 19.88

6.3.3.6.2 Green Space Provision

6.3.3.6.2.1
Green space per capita (m²/person)

Green/open space per capita or per dwelling (m²/person or m²/unit).

Method. (Total public green/open space ÷ population)

Measured value 10.13
6.3.3.6.2.2
Green/open space per dwelling (m²/unit)

Green/open space per capita or per dwelling (m²/person or m²/unit).

Method. (Total green space ÷ # residential units)

Measured value 30.24

6.3.3.6.3 Tree Canopy Cover

6.3.3.6.3.1
% canopy cover of site/street network

% of site or street network shaded by tree canopy.

Method. (Canopy area ÷ total site/street area) ×100

Measured value 28.75
6.3.3.6.3.2
Street shading % (peak summer, midday)

% of site or street network shaded by tree canopy.

Method. (Shaded street length ÷ total street length) ×100

Measured value 47.94

6.3.3.6.4 Biodiversity Index / Net Gain

6.3.3.6.4.1
Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) index

Change in species diversity or presence of biodiversity net gain outcome

Method. Pre- and post-development ecological surveys; DEFRA/UN metrics

Measured value 12.5
6.3.3.6.4.2
Species diversity index (Shannon/Simpson)

Change in species diversity or presence of biodiversity net gain outcome

Method. Ecological monitoring

Measured value 0.53

6.3.3.6.5 Proximity to Nature

6.3.3.6.5.1
% dwellings within 300–400 m of green/natural space

% of dwellings within a defined walking distance (e.g., 300–400 m) to a park or natural area.

Method. GIS buffer analysis

Measured value 90

6.3.3.6.6 Native / Adaptive Planting

6.3.3.6.6.1
% of landscaped area planted with native/adaptive species

% of landscaping using native or adaptive species.

Method. (Native/adaptive planting area ÷ total landscaped area) ×100

Measured value 65
6.3.3.7

Sustainable Urban Mobility

Ensure high accessibility to public and active transport options while reducing car dependence through integrated transit-oriented design, walkable environments, and supportive mobility amenities.

6.3.3.7.1 Proximity to Transit

6.3.3.7.1.1
% of dwellings within 400 m of bus/BRT stops

% of dwellings within a defined walking distance to public transport (400–800 m depending on code)

Method. GIS buffer analysis (network distance)

Measured value 78.75
6.3.3.7.1.2
% of dwellings within 800 m of metro/rail stations

% of dwellings within a defined walking distance to public transport (400–800 m depending on code)

Method. GIS network analysis

Measured value 73.81

6.3.3.7.2 Active Transport Infrastructure

6.3.3.7.2.1
Total km of bicycle lanes/paths per 1,000 residents

Total length of bicycle lanes/paths (km or km per 1,000 residents) and % of streets with continuous, shaded sidewalks.

Method. (Length of bike lanes ÷ population) ×1000

Measured value 1
6.3.3.7.2.2
% of streets with continuous sidewalks

Total length of bicycle lanes/paths (km or km per 1,000 residents) and % of streets with continuous, shaded sidewalks.

Method. (# streets with sidewalks ÷ total streets) ×100

Measured value 80
6.3.3.7.2.3
% of sidewalks with shade coverage

Total length of bicycle lanes/paths (km or km per 1,000 residents) and % of streets with continuous, shaded sidewalks.

Method. (Shaded sidewalks ÷ total sidewalks) ×100

Measured value 50

6.3.3.7.3 Modal Split

6.3.3.7.3.1
% trips by walking, cycling, public transport

% of trips by walking, cycling, and public transport.

Method. Household travel surveys; smart card data

Measured value 45
6.3.3.7.3.2
Car dependency rate (% trips by private vehicles)

% of trips by walking, cycling, and public transport.

Method. (Trips by private cars ÷ total trips) ×100

Measured value 41.80

6.3.3.7.4 Parking Provision

6.3.3.7.4.1
Parking spaces per dwelling

Average number of parking spaces per dwelling.

Method. (Total parking ÷ total dwellings)

Measured value 1.13
6.3.3.7.4.2
% of parking spaces allocated to carpool/EV

Average number of parking spaces per dwelling.

Method. (EV + carpool spaces ÷ total spaces) ×100

Measured value 9.82

6.3.3.7.5 Supporting Mobility Amenities

6.3.3.7.5.1
Bike storage per dwelling/building

Presence of features such as bike storage, car-share schemes, EV charging points, or shuttle services.

Method. (# storage spaces ÷ dwellings)

Measured value 0.94
6.3.3.7.5.2
EV charging points per 100 parking spaces

Presence of features such as bike storage, car-share schemes, EV charging points, or shuttle services.

Method. (# EV chargers ÷ parking spaces) ×100

Measured value 9.22

No framework entries match that search.

Table 31

Checklist to accompany the framework. Marks stay in this browser.

Infrastructure checklist

118 rows

Question ID Module Pillar Question Method Value Unit Reviewed
1.1.1.1 Infrastructure Economic What is the projected percentage reduction in operational costs compared to the baseline? (Annual operating costs baseline – design case) ÷ baseline ×100 7.5 %
1.1.1.2.1 Infrastructure Economic Shall a Life-Cycle Cost Analysis be completed? Full LCC model per ISO 15686-5 standard YES
1.1.1.2.2 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the estimated payback period of the investment? Capital investment ÷ annual savings 7.5 years
1.1.1.3 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the percentage reduction in capital costs compared to the baseline design? (Baseline cost – optimized design cost) ÷ baseline ×100 7.5 %
1.1.1.4.1 Infrastructure Economic What is the projected percentage reduction in maintenance costs compared to the baseline? (Baseline annual maintenance cost – actual/projected cost) ÷ baseline ×100 9.26 %
1.1.1.4.2 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the annual maintenance cost per household (AED)? Total annual community maintenance ÷ # households 375 AED
1.1.1.5.1 Infrastructure Economic How many values engineering (VE) measures shall be implemented? Count design modifications categorized as VE 5.34 Measures
1.1.1.5.2 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of total project cost shall be saved through implemented VE measures? Summation of cost avoided/saved by VE measures 5.6 %
1.1.2.1 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the current jobs-to-housing ratio within the development area? (# jobs within community ÷ # housing units) 1.13 Jobs
1.1.2.2 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of housing units shall be located within 800 meters of major employment centers or transit corridors? GIS mapping of housing vs. employment nodes/transit 45.19 %
1.1.2.3.1 Infrastructure Economic How many full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs shall be created during the construction phase per 100 residents? Total worker labor hours ÷ 1,800 (FTE) 10 Jobs
1.1.2.3.2 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the number of permanent jobs created per 100 residents’ post-completion? # permanent jobs created post-completion ÷ total residents 30 Jobs
1.1.2.4 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of the project’s total procurement value shall be sourced locally (materials, services, labor)? (Value of local materials/labor ÷ total procurement value) ×100 35 %
1.1.2.5 Infrastructure Economic Shall the community’s unemployment rate show a downward trend since project implementation? (# unemployed ÷ total labor force) ×100 2
1.1.3.1.1 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of public lighting shall be upgraded to LED technology? (# LED luminaires ÷ total luminaires) ×100 75 %
1.1.3.1.2 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of households shall be connected to smart meters under smart grid deployment? (# households connected to smart meters ÷ total households) ×100 80 %
1.1.3.1.3 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of the community’s total operational energy shall be supplied by renewable sources? (Energy from community renewables ÷ total demand) ×100 25 %
1.1.3.2.1 Infrastructure Economic What is the projected percentage reduction in non-revenue water losses compared to the baseline? (Baseline losses – actual losses) ÷ baseline ×100 21.33 %
1.1.3.2.2 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of total water demand shall be met by recycled or rainwater sources? (Recycled + rainwater supply ÷ total water demand) ×100 18.35 %
1.1.3.2.3 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of cooling demand shall be served by district cooling? (District cooling capacity ÷ total cooling demand) ×100 57.5 %
1.1.3.2.4 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of wastewater generated shall be recycled within the precinct? (Recycled wastewater ÷ total wastewater generated) ×100 45 %
1.1.3.2.5 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the measured district cooling efficiency (kW/Ton)? Annual kWh ÷ annual cooling ton-hours 0.85 (kW/Ton)
1.1.3.2.6 Infrastructure Economic What is the projected percentage reduction in water consumption compared to the baseline? (Baseline per capita consumption – actual) ÷ baseline ×100 18.04 %
1.1.3.2.7 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of district-level energy consumption shall be supplied by renewables? (Renewable contribution ÷ total energy use) ×100 24.39 %
1.1.3.3 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of infrastructure materials shall be from recycled or reclaimed sources? (Mass of recycled materials ÷ total materials used) ×100 21.27 %
1.1.3.4.1 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the annual number of service outages per 1000 households? (Annual outages ÷ households ×1000) 1.29 outages/year
1.1.3.4.2 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of critical systems shall incorporate redundancy? (# critical systems with redundancy ÷ total critical systems) ×100 80 % redundancy
1.1.4.1.1 Infrastructure Economic Shall a full Life-Cycle Cost Analysis be conducted as per ISO 15686-5 framework? Conduct full analysis per ISO 15686-5 framework, including Net Present Value (NPV), payback, and sensitivity analysis YES
1.1.4.1.2 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the estimated payback period of the project’s sustainable measures? Total incremental investment ÷ annual operational savings 7.5 years
1.1.4.1.3 Infrastructure Economic What is the projected percentage reduction in life-cycle costs compared to the baseline? (Baseline lifecycle cost – optimized lifecycle cost) ÷ baseline ×100 10.80 %
1.1.5.1.1 Infrastructure Economic Shall the project include a dedicated funding mechanism for long-term asset maintenance (e.g., HOA fund, endowment, or municipal allocation)? Verify creation of HOA reserves, endowments, sinking funds, or municipal budget allocations YES
1.1.5.1.2 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the current funding adequacy ratio for ongoing maintenance? (Annual funds allocated ÷ annual maintenance needs) ×100 100 %
1.1.5.1.3 Infrastructure Economic What shall be the duration of the secured maintenance plan for community assets? Length of planning horizon covered by secured funding 13.21 Years plan
1.2.1.1.1 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of project materials shall meet the required durability or modular standards? (Value of durable/modular/recyclable materials ÷ total material value) ×100 68.75 %
1.2.1.1.3 Infrastructure Economic What is the projected percentage reduction in lifecycle maintenance costs compared to the baseline? (Baseline lifecycle maintenance cost – optimized design cost) ÷ baseline ×100 11.85 %
1.2.1.1.4 Infrastructure Economic What percentage of components shall be modular or replacement-ready? (Modular elements with replaceable parts ÷ total components) ×100 31.68 %
1.3.1.1.1 Infrastructure Social What shall be the total length of walking, cycling, and jogging paths per 1,000 residents? (Total km of walkways, cycle lanes, jogging tracks ÷ community population) ×1,000 3 km/1,000 residents
1.3.1.1.2 Infrastructure Social What percentage of homes shall be within 400 meters of walking or cycling paths? GIS network analysis from housing units to active paths 75 %
1.3.1.1.3 Infrastructure Social What percentage of streets shall provide continuous, safe sidewalks? (# of streets with compliant sidewalks ÷ total streets) ×100 86.25 %
1.3.1.2.1 Infrastructure Social Shall ambient air quality levels be within the stated thresholds? Continuous monitoring of PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, NO₂, O₃, CO YES
1.3.1.2.2 Infrastructure Social Shall the community’s drinking water meet national/WHO quality standards? Test potable water against WHO/national standards 1 % Compliance
1.3.1.2.3 Infrastructure Social What percentage of floor area shall achieve the required daylighting performance? Daylight Factor (DF) or Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA 300/50%) 60 %
1.3.2.1.1 Infrastructure Social How many innovative sustainability or cultural design measures shall be adopted? Count new design/technology solutions not covered under standard credits (e.g., net-positive energy systems, AI-driven energy management, biophilic design, cultural architecture integration) 1.5 innovation
1.3.2.1.2 Infrastructure Social Shall performance verification be conducted to confirm measurable outcomes of the adopted innovations? Measurable outcome must be demonstrated (energy, water, cultural/social benefit) YES
1.3.2.2.1 Infrastructure Social What percentage of households shall have high-speed broadband access? (# households with high-speed broadband ÷ total households) ×100 97.5 %
1.3.2.2.2 Infrastructure Social What percentage of the community area shall have public Wi-Fi access? (Area with free public Wi-Fi ÷ total community area) ×100 57.5 %
1.3.2.2.3 Infrastructure Social What shall be the average broadband speed available in the community? Average download/upload speed recorded 463.36 Mbps
1.3.3.1.1 Infrastructure Social What percentage of dwellings shall be located within 300 meters of a public open space? GIS mapping of residential units to nearest park/public space 67.5 %
1.3.3.1.2 Infrastructure Social What shall be the public open space area per resident? (Total public open space area ÷ resident population) 9.04 m²/person
1.3.3.1.3 Infrastructure Social What percentage of the open space network shall be interconnected? (Connected open space corridors ÷ total open space) ×100 73.75 %
1.3.3.1.4 Infrastructure Social Shall all parks and public spaces comply with universal accessibility standards? % of parks/public spaces compliant with accessibility standards 0.98 % Compliance
1.3.4.1 Infrastructure Social What shall be the average sidewalk illuminance at night? Night-time light measurement at pedestrian level (1.5 m) 57.11 Lux
1.3.4.2 Infrastructure Social What shall be the measured outdoor noise levels in residential or public zones? Continuous noise monitoring in residential/public zones 27.5 dBA
1.3.4.3.1 Infrastructure Social What shall be the ratio of police officers per 100,000 residents? (# active-duty police ÷ population ×100,000) 219 officers
1.3.4.3.2 Infrastructure Social What shall be the homicide rate in the community per 100,000 residents? (# homicides ÷ population ×100,000) 2 rate per 100,000 residents
1.3.5.1.1 Infrastructure Social What shall be the residential density within 800 meters of major transit nodes? (# dwelling units within 800 m of major transit ÷ area in ha) 70 du/ha
1.3.5.1.2 Infrastructure Social What proportion of total GFA within 800 meters of major transit shall be mixed-use? (Mixed-use GFA within 800 m ÷ total GFA) ×100 39.13 % of GFA
1.3.5.2.1 Infrastructure Social What shall be the connectivity index of the community’s street network? (# links ÷ # nodes) 1.55
1.3.5.2.2 Infrastructure Social What percentage of intersections shall meet spacing criteria (90–150 m)? (# intersections within 90–150 m spacing ÷ total intersections) ×100 75.73 %
1.3.5.2.3 Infrastructure Social What shall be the average block length in the development area? Mean block length in development 135 m
1.3.5.3.1 Infrastructure Social What percentage of residents shall live within 400–500 meters of frequent public transit? (# residents within 400–500 m walk of transit stop ÷ total population) ×100 56.25 %
1.3.5.3.2 Infrastructure Social What shall be the average peak-hour transit service headway? Peak-hour headways (minutes) 11 mins
1.4.1.1.1 Infrastructure Environmental Shall post-development runoff equal or fall below pre-development rates? Hydrologic modeling (e.g., Rational Method, SWMM) YES
1.4.1.1.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of stormwater runoff shall be treated before discharge? Volume of stormwater treated ÷ total runoff 80 %
1.4.1.2.1 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total site area shall incorporate green infrastructure? (GI area ÷ total site area) ×100 22.5 %
1.4.1.2.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total water demand shall be met through decentralized reuse systems? Volume of greywater/rainwater reused ÷ total demand 25 %
1.4.1.2.3 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of the population shall have access to safe piped water? (# people with piped safe water ÷ total population) ×100 100 %
1.4.1.2.4 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of wastewater shall be safely treated before discharge? (Volume treated ÷ total wastewater generated) ×100 91.25 %
1.4.1.3.1 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of municipal solid waste shall be recycled? (Recycled MSW ÷ total MSW generated) ×100 43.75 %
1.4.1.3.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of the population shall have access to regular waste collection services? (# population served ÷ total population) ×100 98.75 %
1.4.2.1.1 Infrastructure Environmental Shall there be a documented community-scale energy strategy addressing efficiency and renewable integration? Verify documented strategy including energy efficiency goals, renewable targets, and demand reduction measures YES
1.4.2.1.2 Infrastructure Environmental What is the projected percentage improvement in energy performance compared to the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline? Energy modeling at community scale (baseline = ASHRAE 90.1 or local code) 17.5 %
1.4.2.1.3 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total community energy demand shall be met through renewable sources? (Annual renewable energy generated ÷ total community energy demand) ×100 17.5 %
1.4.2.1.4 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of buildings shall be connected to a district energy system? (# buildings connected ÷ total buildings) ×100 80 %
1.4.2.1.5 Infrastructure Environmental Shall monitoring and reporting systems such as smart meters or energy dashboards be implemented? Verify presence of real-time energy monitoring at building and district levels YES
1.4.3.1 Infrastructure Environmental What is the projected percentage reduction in outdoor/landscape irrigation water demand compared to the baseline? Landscape water budget model (EPA WaterSense, Estidama baseline) 72.75 %
1.4.3.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of cooling system make-up water shall come from recycled sources? (Recycled water volume ÷ total cooling system makeup) ×100 81.25 %
1.4.3.3.1 Infrastructure Environmental Shall the decorative water supply use 100% non-potable or on-site water sources? (Non-potable supply ÷ total demand) ×100 YES
1.4.3.4 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the pollutant removal efficiency of the stormwater treatment system? Water quality modeling/testing 92.5 %
1.4.3.5.1 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the average potable water use per person per day? (Total potable water use ÷ population ÷ 365) 220 L/person/day
1.4.3.6 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of the population shall have access to safe piped drinking water? (# population with piped safe water ÷ total population) ×100 98.75 %
1.4.4.1 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the per capita potable water use in liters per person per day? (Total potable water supplied ÷ population ÷ 365) 128.39 L / P / D
1.4.4.2.1 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage reduction in energy use compared to the baseline shall be achieved? (Baseline EUI – actual/projected EUI) ÷ baseline ×100 18 %
1.4.4.2.2 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the average annual building energy use intensity (EUI)? Annual operational energy ÷ GFA 124.53 kWh/m²·yr
1.4.4.3 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total material cost shall include recycled or reclaimed content? (Value of recycled materials ÷ total material value) ×100 22.5 %
1.4.4.4 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the average municipal solid waste generated per person each year? (Annual municipal waste ÷ population) 436.46 kg/person/year
1.4.4.5 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the average ecological footprint per resident (gha/person)? Environmental impact model (energy, water, waste, land use per capita) 1.75 gha/person
1.4.5.1.1 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the measured annual mean PM₂.₅ concentration in the community? Continuous AQ monitoring 7.5 µg/m³ annual mean
1.4.5.1.2 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the daily mean PM₁₀ concentration in the area? AQI calculation, daily sampling 43.60 µg/m³ daily mean
1.4.5.1.3 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the measured annual mean NO₂ concentration? Continuous monitoring 33.33 µg/m³ annual mean
1.4.5.2.1 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of runoff shall be treated before discharge? (Treated runoff volume ÷ total runoff volume) ×100 85 %
1.4.5.2.2 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the total suspended solids (TSS) removal efficiency? Lab water quality testing for TSS 90 % removal
1.4.5.2.3 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the nutrient removal percentage for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP)? Monitoring nitrogen and phosphorus levels 51.97 % removal
1.4.5.3.1 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of wastewater shall be treated? (Volume treated ÷ total wastewater generated) ×100 83.75 %
1.4.5.3.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of treated wastewater shall be reused? (Reused volume ÷ total wastewater treated) ×100 37.5 %
1.4.5.4.1 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the daytime ambient noise level? Long-term noise monitoring 50.13 dBA
1.4.5.4.2 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the nighttime ambient noise level? Long-term noise monitoring 40.18 dBA
1.4.5.5 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of landscaped area shall consist of native or adapted species? (Native/adapted area ÷ total landscaped area) ×100 45 %
1.4.5.6 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of the population shall have access to safe drinking water? (# population with piped water ÷ total) ×100 100 %
1.4.6.1.1 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of peak demand shall be supplied by installed renewable energy capacity? Sum of installed nameplate capacity of PV, wind, or other renewable plants at community/district level 18.37 %
1.4.6.1.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total community energy demand shall be supplied by renewable sources? (Annual renewable output ÷ total annual community demand) ×100 35 %
1.4.6.1.3 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of buildings shall be connected to district cooling or heating systems? (# buildings connected to district system ÷ total buildings) ×100 57.5 %
1.4.6.1.4 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the thermal plant efficiency in kW per ton of cooling? Annual kWh ÷ annual ton-hours 0.71 kW/ton
1.4.6.1.5 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of daily peak demand shall be supported by energy storage capacity? Installed storage system rating (capacity × duration) 12.02 % of daily peak demand
1.4.6.1.6 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of households shall be connected to smart grid systems via smart meters? (# households with smart meters ÷ total households) ×100 85 %
1.4.7.1.1 Infrastructure Environmental Shall a documented city or community greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction strategy be implemented? Verify presence of documented GHG/climate action plan with targets YES
1.4.7.1.2 Infrastructure Environmental What is the projected percentage reduction in GHG emissions compared to the baseline? (Baseline modeled emissions – actual/projected emissions) ÷ baseline ×100 25 %
1.4.7.2.1 Infrastructure Environmental What is the projected percentage reduction in vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) or transport emissions compared to the baseline? (Baseline VKT/emissions – project VKT/emissions) ÷ baseline ×100 15.69 %
1.4.7.2.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total trips shall be made by walking, cycling, or public transport? (Trips by walking, cycling, transit ÷ total trips) ×100 32.60 %
1.4.7.3.1 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the average per capita GHG emission? (Annual total GHG ÷ population) 4.43 tCO₂e/person
1.4.7.3.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of total energy supply should come from renewable sources? (Renewable supply ÷ total energy supply) ×100 25 %
1.4.8.1 Infrastructure Environmental What shall be the Arc Waste Performance Score achieved? Report through Arc (data-driven scoring) 45 prerequisite
1.4.8.2 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of the community shall have access to public recycling bins? (# households or public areas with recycling infrastructure ÷ total) ×100 97.5 %
1.4.8.3 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of construction and demolition waste should be diverted from landfill? (Diverted C&D waste ÷ total C&D waste) ×100 56.25 %
1.4.8.4 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of waste shall be diverted from landfill through the operational waste management program? (Diverted MSW ÷ total MSW) ×100 50 %
1.4.8.5 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of waste shall be diverted from landfill through the enhanced operational waste management program? (Diverted MSW ÷ total MSW) ×100 67.64 %
1.4.8.6 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of organics collection or composting facilities shall be provided on-site? Verify collection/treatment for organics 100 %
1.4.8.7 Infrastructure Environmental What percentage of buildings shall provide source-segregated recycling bins? (# buildings with bins for recyclables/general/compost ÷ total) ×100 85 %

Housing checklist

117 rows

Question ID Module Pillar Question Method Value Unit Reviewed
2.1.1.1 Housing Economic What will your household’s monthly housing cost-to-income ratio be? (Monthly housing costs ÷ gross household income) ×100 37.08 %
2.1.1.2 Housing Economic What percentage of your household income will be spent on mortgage repayment? (Monthly mortgage ÷ household income) ×100 26.88 %
2.1.1.3 Housing Economic What is the % of Households Spending >30% Income on Housing on housing? (# households with cost burden ÷ total households) ×100 30 %
2.1.2.1 Housing Economic What percentage of your household income will typically be spent on essential needs? (Total essential spending ÷ total income) ×100 30 %
2.1.2.2 Housing Economic What is the maximum walking distance to essential services or healthcare? Average walking distance or public transport cost to groceries, schools, healthcare 369.81 m
2.1.2.3 Housing Economic What proportion of your household income will be spent on transportation costs annually? (Annual transport costs ÷ household income) ×100 12.78 %
2.1.3.1 Housing Economic What will your household income be relative to the national median? (# unemployed ÷ labor force) ×100 5 %
2.1.3.2 Housing Economic How will you rate the GDP per capita trend in your region relative to inflation? GDP ÷ population 2.76 GDP per capita
2.1.4.1 Housing Economic What will the ratio of median housing cost to median household income be? (Median monthly housing costs ÷ median monthly household income) ×100 41.89 %
2.1.5.1 Housing Economic What is the % of total units designated as affordable distributed? (Affordable units ÷ total units) ×100 18.72 %
2.1.5.2 Housing Economic What will the distribution of affordable units across dwelling types be? (# affordable villas, townhouses, apartments) ÷ total by type 0.96 type per development
2.1.6.1 Housing Economic What will your estimated annual saving from energy efficiency measures in your household be? (as a percentage) (Baseline utility costs – efficient system utility costs) 23.87 %
2.1.6.2 Housing Economic What will your annual savings from water efficiency measures be? (as a percentage) (Baseline water costs – efficient system water costs) 22.60 %
2.1.6.3 Housing Economic What will the annual financial offset from renewable energy generation in your household be? (as a percentage) (Renewable generation × utility tariff) 25 %
2.1.7.1 Housing Economic What will the diversity index value for housing typologies in your development be? (Proportion of each housing type used in diversity calculation) 0.63
2.1.7.2 Housing Economic How many distinct housing typologies will be represented in your development? (Units of type ÷ total units) ×100 3.25 typologies
2.2.1.1 Housing Economic What will your building’s annual maintenance cost be as a percentage of its replacement value? (Annual maintenance cost ÷ replacement cost) ×100 2.48 % per year
2.2.1.2 Housing Economic What percentage of buildings will be retrofitted every ten years? (# retrofitted buildings ÷ total buildings) ×100 19.49 % of stock retrofitted every 10 years
2.2.1.3 Housing Economic What will the ratio of your maintenance backlog to the annual maintenance budget be? (Backlog maintenance cost ÷ annual maintenance budget) 7.5 %
2.2.2.1 Housing Economic Will your project have a documented lifecycle asset management plan? Verification of asset management documentation YES
2.2.2.2 Housing Economic What will the time horizon of your lifecycle cost coverage be? Time span of LCC (years) 15 Years
2.2.3.2 Housing Economic What will the average payback period for your efficiency retrofit investments be? (Investment ÷ annual savings) 7.5 Years
2.2.4.1 Housing Economic What percentage of materials/components will have a durability of 30 years or more? (Durable components ÷ total components) ×100 53.30 %
2.2.4.2 Housing Economic What portion of your maintenance budget will be allocated to preventative maintenance? (Preventative maintenance budget ÷ total budget) ×100 75 %
2.3.1.2 Housing Economic What will your household income be relative to the national median? Ratio of median housing cost ÷ median household income 22.5 %
2.4.1.1 Housing Social What is the Unit Size Standard for your project for 1-bedroom dwellings? Compare unit sizes against benchmarks 42.31 m²
2.4.1.1_2 Housing Social What is the Unit Size Standard for your project for 2-bedroom dwellings? Compare unit sizes against benchmarks 57 m²
2.4.2.1 Housing Social What is the % of population in affordable housing community? (Residents in affordable units ÷ total residents) ×100 25.20 %
2.4.2.2 Housing Social Regarding % of units below-market rate: to enhance affordability? (Affordable housing units ÷ total units) ×100 19.7 % of stock
2.4.3.1 Housing Social Regarding m² of living space per person: your housing development? (Total residential GFA ÷ population) 17.5 m²/person
2.4.3.2 Housing Social What is the planned crowding index (persons/bedroom) for the project? (Persons ÷ dwelling unit) 1.88 persons per bedroom
2.4.4.1 Housing Social What shall the Housing Diversity Index (for various housing types) for your project be? Index calculation based on distribution of dwelling types 0.63
2.4.4.2 Housing Social Regarding % of developments with ≥3 housing typologies: housing typologies (e.g., apartments, villas, townhouses)? (Developments with ≥3 typologies ÷ total developments) ×100 42.38 %
2.5.1.1 Housing Social What percentage of the regularly occupied floor area achieves spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA 300/50%), that is, 300 lux for at least 50% of annual occupied hours? Spatial Daylight Autonomy analysis (% of regularly occupied spaces achieving 300 lux for ≥50% of hours) 60 %
2.5.1.2 Housing Social What are the ventilation rates (L/s per person) designed for the building compared to ASHRAE 62.1 or Estidama minimum standards? Compare with ASHRAE 62.1 / Estidama minimums 8.60 L/s.person
2.5.1.3 Housing Social Regarding Low-VOC materials compliance: project that comply with low-VOC emission standards? % of paints, adhesives, flooring meeting VOC standards 90 %
2.5.2.1 Housing Social What shall be the outdoor ambient noise levels (dB LAeq) during daytime and nighttime periods? Noise monitoring at site boundaries 49.67 dB
2.5.2.3 Housing Social Thermal comfort (PMV/PPD index): Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) index? Predicted Mean Vote/Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied 82.5 % occupant acceptability
2.5.3.1.1 Housing Social Regarding Housing Diversity Index (Shannon/Simpson): be, based on the distribution of dwelling typologies in your development? Diversity index calculation based on dwelling typologies 0.63
2.5.3.2.1 Housing Social What percentage of total housing units will be designated as affordable housing? (Affordable units ÷ total housing units) ×100 21.08 %
2.5.3.2.2 Housing Social Regarding % of projects with formal affordable housing strategies: community development plan? Verification of inclusion in masterplans 0.98 %
2.5.3.2.3 Housing Social What percentage of units are provided as social housing for lower-income households? (Social housing units ÷ total housing units) ×100 10.65 %
2.5.4.1.1 Housing Social How many stakeholder or public meetings (e.g., charrettes, or hearings) will be held during the planning and design phases of your project? Count of formal consultation events (workshops, charrettes, hearings) 3.03 engagement events per major project phase
2.5.4.2.1 Housing Social What percentage of residents/stakeholders will be consulted through engagement activities during the design and planning stages? (# residents engaged ÷ total resident population) ×100 13.75 % of residents
2.5.4.3.1 Housing Social What percentage of design changes will be influenced by community feedback from the community engagement process? (# changes linked to feedback ÷ total design changes) ×100 23.85 % of major design decisions demonstrate influence
2.5.4.4.1.a Housing Social Regarding % of building façades incorporating vernacular design elements: design features (e.g., mashrabiya, courtyards, local ornamentation, traditional roof forms)? Count façades that include recognised vernacular features (e.g. mashrabiya, courtyards, traditional roof forms, local ornamentation) ÷ total façades × 100 32.10 %
2.5.4.4.1.b Housing Social What percentage of construction materials are sourced locally or derived from traditional regional materials? Area (m²) or cost (AED) of primary cladding, finishing, ornamentation materials sourced locally or from tradition ÷ total material area or cost ×100 40 %
2.5.5.1 Housing Social Resident / Stakeholder Perception of Cultural Identity (%): To what extent will residents or stakeholders agree that the development reflects local architectural character and vernacular heritage? (Measured as % of positive responses: agree/strongly agree)? Survey of residents / users asking “To what extent does this development reflect local architectural character / vernacular heritage?” on a Likert scale (e.g. strongly disagree → strongly agree). Compute % of positive responses (agree/strongly agree) 63.75 %
2.5.5.2 Housing Social Regarding Compliance with Heritage / Cultural Authority Guidelines: by local heritage or cultural authorities in compliance with official guidelines? % of project design elements (façades, massing, materials) subject to review / approval by local heritage / architectural authorities, and compliance confirmed in permits / review letters 85 %
2.5.5.3.1 Housing Social What is the Vehicle Dependency (Contextual ) development area? # registered private vehicles ÷ population × 1,000 376.47 Per 1,000 residents
2.5.5.3.2.a Housing Social What is the Vehicle Dependency (Contextual ) development area? # private vehicles ÷ # households 0.85 cars/household
2.5.5.3.2.b Housing Social What percentage of trips will be made by sustainable transport modes such as public transport, walking, or cycling? Share of trips by car, public transport, walking, cycling 43.33 % car trips
2.5.5.3.2.c Housing Social What is the average daily travel distance per person for residents in the neighbourhood? Total VKT ÷ total population 15.69 km/day
2.5.5.3.3 Housing Social Regarding Transit accessibility index: walking distance of a frequent bus stop or within 800 metres of a rail or metro station? % of dwellings within 400 m walk of frequent bus or 800 m of rail/metro 75 %
2.5.5.4.1 Housing Social Regarding Housing Cost Burden: monthly housing costs (rent or mortgage) relative to median gross monthly household income? Median monthly housing cost (rent or mortgage) ÷ median gross monthly household income × 100 35.19 %
2.5.5.4.3 Housing Social Regarding % of affordable units provided: affordable or social housing? (# of affordable/social units ÷ total units) × 100 22.5 %
2.5.5.5 Housing Social Regarding Housing Diversity & Affordability: distribution of different housing types (e.g., apartments, villas, townhouses)? 1 – Σ(share of each housing type²) 0.63
2.5.5.6.a Housing Social Regarding % of units allocated to low-/middle-income households: middle-income households (below market rate)? (# units priced for low-/middle-income brackets ÷ total units) × 100 16.12 % of units below market rate
2.5.5.6.b Housing Social Regarding % of units allocated to low-/middle-income households: will your project earn according to the affordability and housing diversity criteria? Based on % of affordable units and diversity mix delivered 20 % of units below market rate
2.5.6.2.a Housing Social Regarding % of units with private outdoor space: balcony that meets the required minimum dimensions and design standards? (# of units with qualifying balcony/private outdoor space ÷ total units) × 100 90 %
2.5.6.2.b Housing Social Regarding % of units with private outdoor space: private outdoor space, measured as a ratio of balcony GIA to total unit GIA? Balcony GIA ÷ unit GIA × 100 9.72 %
2.5.7.2 Housing Social Regarding % of affordable housing units delivered: or social housing units delivered for lower-income residents? (# of affordable/social units ÷ total units) × 100 30 %
2.5.7.2.1.a Housing Social Regarding % of low-/middle-income households accommodated: and have access to affordable housing options? (# of low-/middle-income households with access to affordable housing ÷ total households) × 100 22.5 %
2.5.7.2.1.b Housing Social Regarding % of low-/middle-income households accommodated: points (0–4) will your project achieve according to the percentage of affordable units provided? Award points based on % of affordable units and policy measures implemented (e.g., inclusionary zoning, subsidies, rent caps) 19.89 %
2.5.7.3 Housing Social Regarding Social inclusion participation rate (%): accessible to low-income or vulnerable population groups within your community? (# of community facilities and services accessible to low-income groups ÷ total community facilities) × 100 75 %
2.5.9 Housing Social Regarding Urban Density & Layout: developable hectare (du/ha)? # dwelling units ÷ net developable hectares 32.99 du/ha
2.5.10 Housing Social What is the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) total site area? Total GFA ÷ total site area 0.97 FAR
2.5.10.1 Housing Social Regarding Intersection density (intersections/ha): higher intersections per net developable hectare? # intersections with ≥3 legs ÷ net developable hectares 67.5 intersections/ha
2.5.10.2 Housing Social Regarding Lighting Quality (Circadian & Ergonomic): spaces, sustained for at least four hours per day? Measure EML at eye level for ≥4 hrs/day in occupied spaces 245.43 EML in regularly occupied spaces
2.5.10.3 Housing Social Regarding Tunable lighting CCT range: occupied spaces, ensuring appropriate circadian support? Installed systems with tunable correlated color temperature (CCT) range 2565 Kelvin
2.5.10.4 Housing Social Daylight factor / sDA compliance: (sDA 300/50%) threshold or a daylight factor of at least 2%? Spatial daylight autonomy (sDA 300/50%) or DF ≥2% in occupied spaces 54.09 % sDA
2.5.10.5 Housing Social What shall be the acoustic comfort levels (dB) during daytime and nighttime periods? Measure long-term average at project boundary 50.90 dB
2.5.10.6 Housing Social What shall be the Indoor ambient noise Criterion (NC) rating? Measured background noise level vs. Noise Criterion (NC) 32.5 NC
2.5.10.7 Housing Social What will be the maximum reverberation time (RT60) for relevant indoor spaces (e.g., offices, classrooms) in your development, measured in seconds? Measure reverberation in occupied rooms 0.30 Sec
2.6.1.1.1 Housing Environmental Regarding % of households with access to improved sanitation: as sewerage connections or approved on-site systems? (# households connected to sewerage / improved on-site systems ÷ total households) × 100 100 %
2.6.1.1.2 Housing Environmental Regarding % of households with inclusive solid waste collection: waste collection services (e.g., Door-to-door collection)? (# households with regular door-to-door waste collection ÷ total households) × 100 92.5 %
2.6.1.1.3 Housing Environmental Regarding % of sanitation facilities accessible to disabled persons: meet accessibility standards for persons with disabilities? (# of public sanitation facilities meeting accessibility standards ÷ total public facilities) × 100 95 %
2.6.1.1.4 Housing Environmental Regarding % of waste diverted from landfill (community scale): or material recovery initiatives? (Recycled + composted + recovered waste ÷ total generated waste) × 100 70 %
2.6.2.1.1 Housing Environmental Regarding % improvement vs. baseline code: energy code as per ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G modelling? Whole-building energy model per ASHRAE 90.1 (Appendix G) comparing Proposed vs. Baseline 22.5 %
2.6.2.1.2 Housing Environmental Regarding Renewable energy share at building level (%): contracted renewable energy sources? (On-site + contracted renewables credited to building) ÷ annual building energy use ×100 12.5 %
2.6.2.3.2 Housing Environmental Regarding Vegetated/ shaded hardscape: during the hottest months? (Vegetated + tree-shade + canopy-shade area at noon peak) ÷ total hardscape ×100 43.2 %
2.6.2.3.3 Housing Environmental Regarding Balcony/facade shading factor: coverage during peak solar hours, based on simulation or observation? Modeled shaded time/area on habitable balconies & pedestrian routes 75 %
2.6.2.5.1 Housing Environmental Regarding % end-use energy from renewables: including solar, wind, or other clean energy systems? (Renewable end-use energy ÷ total end-use energy) ×100 25 %
2.6.2.11 Housing Environmental Regarding Renewable Energy Share: generated renewable energy systems? (On-site + local community renewables) ÷ total demand ×100 16.20 %
2.6.3.1 Housing Environmental What will your project’s Arc Energy Performance Score be, based on operational data? Energy performance calculated via Arc platform (normalized EUI vs. baseline, weighted by occupancy, operating hours, and climate) 48.57 %
2.6.3.3 Housing Environmental What is the projected percentage reduction in energy performance compared to the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline? Whole building simulation (Appendix G methodology) 12 %
2.6.3.4.1 Housing Environmental What is the projected percentage improvement in energy performance compared to the ASHRAE 90.1 baseline? Modeled proposed design vs. ASHRAE 90.1 baseline 28.09 %
2.6.3.5.1 Housing Environmental What is the % reduction in external heat gain design? Energy simulation comparing baseline vs. passive envelope design 51.09 %
2.6.3.5.2 Housing Environmental What percentage of roof area will achieve a Solar Reflectance Index (SRI) of ≥78? % of roof area with SRI ≥78 72.42 %
2.6.3.6.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of total annual energy demand will be covered by on-site renewable generation? (On-site renewable generation ÷ total annual building demand) ×100 9.68 %
2.6.3.7.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of building energy demand will be offset using Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs)? (RECs purchased ÷ total annual building energy demand) ×100 20 %
2.6.4.1.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of construction waste will be diverted from landfill through reuse, or recovery? (Recycled + reused + recovered C&D waste ÷ total C&D waste generated) ×100 56.25 %
2.6.4.2.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of operational waste will be diverted from landfill through recycling or composting? (Recycled + composted + recovered ÷ total operational waste) ×100 45 %
2.6.4.3 Housing Environmental What percentage of total hardscape area will use modular or recycled materials? (Area of modular/recycled paving ÷ total hardscape) ×100 66.60 %
2.6.4.4.1 Housing Environmental What proportion of your population will have access to formal waste collection services? (# of residents covered by municipal/contracted waste collection ÷ total population) ×100 96.25 %
2.6.4.5.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of total municipal waste will be recycled annually? (Recycled municipal waste ÷ total municipal waste) ×100 31.25 %
2.6.4.6.1 Housing Environmental How many active community waste diversion or recycling programmes will be in place? Count ongoing recycling/education programs in community 4 programs
2.6.5.1 Housing Environmental What will be the average number of cars per household in your area? (# registered private vehicles ÷ # households) greater than 1.3 cars/household
2.6.5.2 Housing Environmental How many cars will be registered per 1,000 residents in your community? (# registered vehicles ÷ population × 1,000) 388.24 per 1,000 residents
2.6.5.2.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of households in your area will not own private vehicles? (# households without private vehicles ÷ total households) ×100 11.1 %
2.6.6.1 Housing Environmental What will your project’s Arc Air Quality Score be according to the Arc platform? Arc platform calculates score using WHO/US-EPA AQI metrics (PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, O₃, NO₂, SO₂, CO) 50.49 %
2.6.6.4 Housing Environmental What will be the average carbon monoxide (CO) concentration in enclosed car park areas? Continuous monitoring (ppm → mg/m³ conversion) 41.03 mg/m³
2.6.6.5 Housing Environmental What will be the nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) concentration measured in your car park environment? Sensor monitoring 83.33 µg/m³
2.6.6.6 Housing Environmental What will be the PM₁₀ particulate concentration recorded in car park ventilation measurements? Sensor monitoring 22.81 µg/m³
2.6.6.7 Housing Environmental What will be the average separation distance between outdoor air intakes and pollution sources? Distance between outdoor intakes and pollution sources 8.38 m from exhaust/combustion sources
2.6.6.10 Housing Environmental What will be the average indoor PM₂.₅ concentration (µg/m³)? Indoor air monitoring 7.16 µg/m³
2.6.6.11 Housing Environmental What will be the indoor CO₂ concentration level measured during occupancy? IAQ sensors 371.43 ppm
2.6.6.11.1 Housing Environmental What will be the concentration of total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) indoors? Lab IAQ testing 125 µg/m³
2.6.6.11.2 Housing Environmental What will be the formaldehyde concentration level measured indoors? Lab IAQ testing 23.02 µg/m³
2.6.7.1.1 Housing Environmental What is the % reduction in indoor potable water use vs. baseline calculations? Calculate baseline fixture water use per LEED/Estidama methodology (local plumbing code baselines); compare to design case 36.56 %
2.6.8.4 Housing Environmental What will be the annual mean PM₂.₅ concentration level recorded in your area? Continuous monitoring (µg/m³) 5.09 µg/m³
2.6.8.4.1 Housing Environmental What will be the daily mean PM₁₀ concentration recorded in outdoor monitoring? Monitoring records 23.19 µg/m³
2.6.8.5 Housing Environmental What will be the measured indoor CO₂ concentration level? Continuous monitoring 383.33 ppm
2.6.8.5.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of regularly occupied spaces will achieve Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA)? Daylight modeling or on-site measurement 60 sDA
2.6.8.5.2 Housing Environmental What will be the Noise Criterion (NC) rating for background noise in indoor residential areas? Indoor background noise levels (NC rating) 32.5 NC
2.6.9.3.1 Housing Environmental What is the % reduction vs. baseline emissions levels? (Annual CO₂e avoided ÷ baseline emissions) ×100 21.94 %
2.6.9.4.1 Housing Environmental What percentage of total annual energy demand will be supplied by renewable energy sources? (Renewable energy delivered ÷ total annual energy demand) ×100 12.40 %

Urban planning checklist

207 rows

Question ID Module Pillar Question Method Value Unit Reviewed
3.1.1.1.1 Urban Economic What percentage of the construction workforce will be sourced locally? (# local hires ÷ total construction workforce) ×100 26 %
3.1.1.1.2 Urban Economic How many apprenticeship or training positions will be created per 10 construction jobs? Count of apprenticeships per project 1.13 apprenticeship per 10 construction jobs
3.1.1.1.3 Urban Economic What percentage of payroll will be invested annually in workforce training? Track employer or developer contributions to workforce upskilling 1.75 %
3.1.1.2 Urban Economic What will be the jobs-to-housing ratio in your community? (# jobs ÷ # housing units) 1.13 jobs per dwelling unit
3.1.1.2.1 Urban Economic What percentage of total housing units will be affordable to low- and middle-income groups? (# affordable units ÷ total units) ×100 21.06 %
3.1.1.2.2 Urban Economic What proportion of residents will live within 0.5 km of an employment center? GIS analysis of residential vs. job centers 55 %
3.1.1.3 Urban Economic What will be the overall unemployment rate in your area? (# unemployed ÷ total workforce) ×100 5.36 %
3.1.1.3.1.a Urban Economic Youth unemployment rate (%): . What will be the unemployment rate among youth (aged 15–24)? (# unemployed aged 15–24 ÷ total youth workforce) ×100 11.86 %
3.1.1.3.1.b Urban Economic What will be the median household income in your area compared to the national average? (Community median ÷ national median) ×100 100 %
3.1.2.1.a Urban Economic Regarding Mixed-Use Development Provision: commercial, retail, or office spaces? (Non-residential GFA ÷ total GFA) ×100 12.15 %
3.1.2.1.b Urban Economic What is the Mixed-Use Development Provision space? GIS analysis of proximity to retail/commercial space 55 %
3.1.2.2.a Urban Economic What will be the average commercial floor area provided per resident in the community? (Total commercial GFA ÷ resident population) 5.19 m² per resident
3.1.2.2.b Urban Economic What will be the employment density (jobs per 100 residents) within the community? (# jobs within community ÷ population) ×100 24.85 jobs per 100 residents
3.1.2.2.c Urban Economic What will be the vacancy rate of commercial floor area in the development? (Vacant commercial floor area ÷ total commercial floor area) ×100 5.03 %
3.1.3.1.a Urban Economic What will be the overall unemployment rate among individuals aged 16 and above in your area? (# unemployed ÷ labor force aged 16+) ×100 4.4 %
3.1.3.1.b Urban Economic What will be the unemployment rate among youth aged 15–24 in your area? (# unemployed aged 15–24 ÷ youth labor force) ×100 17.5 %
3.1.3.1.c Urban Economic What percentage of job seekers will successfully secure employment? (# residents securing jobs ÷ total job seekers) ×100 67.29 %
3.1.3.2.a Urban Economic Regarding Local Employment & Skills: apprenticeship programs? (Investment in workforce initiatives ÷ total project value) ×100 2.90 %
3.1.3.2.b Urban Economic What percentage of the total workforce will consist of local residents? (# local residents employed ÷ total project workforce) ×100 25.65 %
3.1.3.2.c Urban Economic How many apprenticeship positions will be created per 10 workers on the project? (# apprenticeships ÷ total workforce) ×100 0.98 apprenticeship per 10 workers
3.1.3.2.d Urban Economic How many hours of training will be provided per worker each year? Total training hours ÷ total workforce 20.98 hours/worker/year
3.1.4.1.a Urban Economic How often will high-touch surfaces (e.g., door handles, switches, railings) be cleaned per day? (# cleanings/day of high-touch areas such as door handles, switches, railings) 2.07 times/day
3.1.4.1.b Urban Economic What percentage of disinfectants used will meet EPA/WHO safety and efficacy standards? % of disinfectants meeting EPA/WHO standards for safety & efficacy 100 %
3.1.4.1.c Urban Economic Regarding Cleaning & Disinfection: or easy-clean coatings? % of high-touch interior surfaces (e.g., counters, flooring, handles) with antimicrobial or easy-clean coatings 72.5 %
3.1.4.1.d Urban Economic What percentage of cleaning staff will be trained in disinfection and provided with PPE? % of cleaning staff trained in disinfection & provided PPE 100 %
3.1.5.1.a Urban Economic What percentage of buildings incorporate Regional & Cultural design elements? (Buildings with approved local architectural features ÷ total new buildings) ×100 29.08 %
3.1.5.1.b Urban Economic What percentage of materials are regionally and culturally sourced? (Cost of local/regional materials ÷ total materials cost) ×100 13.66 %
3.1.5.1.c Urban Economic How many cultural symbols or design elements will be incorporated per hectare in the public realm? # of cultural symbols, landscape features, or design motifs per hectare 2.83 elements/ha
3.1.5.3.a Urban Economic What percentage of eligible heritage buildings will be adaptively reused? (# reused heritage buildings ÷ total eligible heritage buildings) ×100 50.53 %
3.1.5.3.b Urban Economic How many cultural events, exhibitions, or festivals will be held annually? (# cultural events, exhibitions, or festivals per year) 5 events/year
3.1.24.6.1.a Urban Economic What will be the average Direct Route Index in your community? (Shortest path ÷ straight-line distance) 1.41
3.1.24.6.1.b Urban Economic What will be the typical distance between shaded seating/rest points? Distance between shaded rest areas (m) 236.44 m
3.2.1.1.a Urban Social What percentage of the vulnerable population has access to quality public open space? (# vulnerable population within 500m ÷ total vulnerable population) ×100 92.5 %
3.2.1.1.b Urban Social What percentage of the population is exposed to environmental hazards such as air pollution (PM2.5 above WHO limits), excessive noise (>55 dB), or proximity to heavy traffic? (# exposed residents ÷ total residents) ×100 7.77 %
3.2.1.1.c Urban Social What percentage of households are actively engaged in community activities? (# participating households ÷ total households) ×100 32.5 %
3.2.2.1.a Urban Social What will be the homicide rate per 100,000 population in your community? (# homicides ÷ population ×100,000) 2.05 per 100,000
3.2.2.1.b Urban Social What will be the property crime rate per 100,000 population? (# theft/burglary cases ÷ population ×100,000) 220.17 per 100,000
3.2.2.2.a Urban Social What is the maximum distance from a drop-off point to the building entrance (dismount distance)? Max uninterrupted safe pathway length before dismount 5 m
3.2.2.2.b Urban Social What is the minimum average maintained illuminance level required for cycle tracks? Lux meter readings along sidewalks and cycle tracks 45.64 Lux
3.2.2.2.c Urban Social Regarding Safe Mobility & Urban Design: sightline standards? % of public realm areas with clear sightlines, natural surveillance 85 %
3.2.2.3 Urban Social How many Risk Assessment & Security Planning strategies are implemented per site? # of design strategies applied (access control, barriers, CCTV) 3.09 strategies per site
3.2.2.4 Urban Social How many emergency drills will be conducted per year? (# drills conducted ÷ year) 2 per year
3.2.2.5 Urban Social What percentage of public realm areas will comply with CPTED design standards?" (Compliant area ÷ total public realm) ×100 95 %
3.2.2.6 Urban Social How many CCTV cameras and visibility-enhancing design elements will be installed per hectare?" # of CCTV cameras and visibility-enhancing elements per hectare 1.09 camera/ha
3.2.3.1 Urban Social What will be the daily per-capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in your community? (Total vehicle miles traveled ÷ population) 22.45 VMT/person/day
3.2.3.1.1 Urban Social "What percentage reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) will be achieved compared to baseline conditions? Compare modeled vs. post-occupancy surveys 14.84 %
3.2.3.2.1 Urban Social What percentage of dwellings will be located within 350 meters of a bus or tram stop? GIS network analysis of walking distance 90 %
3.2.3.2.2 Urban Social What percentage of dwellings will be located within 600 meters of a rail or metro station?" GIS analysis 52.5 %
3.2.3.3 Urban Social What will be the typical service frequency (peak hour headway) of public transport? Timetable analysis 12 bus/tram
3.2.3.4 Urban Social What will be the provision of open space in hectares per 1,000 residents? (Open space area ÷ population) ×1000 2 ha per 1000 residents
3.2.3.4.1 Urban Social "What percentage of total open spaces will be designed for inclusivity (e.g., all age groups and genders)?" (# inclusive spaces ÷ total open spaces) ×100 56.25 %
3.2.3.4.2 Urban Social How many recreational facilities will be provided per 1,000 residents? (# facilities ÷ population ×1000) 2.06 facilities per 1000
3.2.3.5.a Urban Social How many bicycle parking spaces will be provided per building? (# spaces ÷ GFA or dwelling units) 1.07 space per unit
3.2.3.6 Urban Social How many showers or changing rooms will be available per building? (# showers/changing rooms per building) 1.1 per gender per 5000 m²
3.2.3.6.1 Urban Social What proportion of the planned street network will incorporate dedicated cycling infrastructure? (Cycle-friendly street length ÷ total street length) ×100 50 %
3.2.3.7.1 Urban Social What is the Mode share by sustainable transport (%) public transport)? (Trips by walking, cycling, transit ÷ total trips) ×100 38.78 %
3.2.3.7.2 Urban Social Regarding % reduction in single-occupancy vehicle trips: baseline conditions? Compare baseline car mode share vs. project outcomes 11.70 %
3.2.4.1.1 Urban Social What percentage of the project’s total value will be dedicated to training and skills programmes? (Investment in training ÷ total project value) ×100 1.01 %
3.2.4.1.2 Urban Social How many apprenticeships or traineeships will be created per 10 construction jobs? (# apprenticeships ÷ project workforce) 0.96 per 10 construction jobs
3.2.4.1.3 Urban Social What percentage of the total workforce will receive training or upskilling? (# trained workers ÷ total workforce) ×100 56.25 %
3.2.4.1.4 Urban Social What will be the average annual number of training hours per worker? (Total training hours ÷ total workforce) 20.51 %
3.2.4.2.1 Urban Social How many library or learning centre facilities will be available per 1,000 residents? (# facilities ÷ population ×1000) 1.00 per 1000 residents
3.2.4.2.2 Urban Social How many lifelong learning programmes or workshops will be offered annually? (# courses/workshops per year) 2.97 per year
3.2.5.1 Urban Social What will be the total amount of public green space available per capita (m²/person)? (Total public green space area ÷ population) 12.38 m²/person
3.2.5.2 Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 300 metres of accessible green space? (Residents within 300 m ÷ total residents) ×100 70 %
3.2.5.3.1 Urban Social What percentage of landscaped area will use native or drought-tolerant species? (Native/adapted species area ÷ total landscaped area) ×100 70 %
3.2.5.3.2 Urban Social What will be the calculated biodiversity index (e.g., Shannon or Simpson index) for planting areas? Calculate diversity index across planting palette 0.65
3.2.5.3.3 Urban Social What is the projected percentage reduction in irrigation water demand compared to the baseline? % potable water reduction compared to baseline irrigation 44.98 %
3.2.5.4.1 Urban Social What will be the amount of recreational open space available per 1000 residents? (Recreational open space area ÷ population ×1000) 1.87 ha/1000
3.2.5.4.3 Urban Social How many recreational facilities (playgrounds, sports fields, etc.) will be provided per 1000 residents? (# of playgrounds, sports fields, etc. ÷ population ×1000) 2 per 1000 residents
3.2.5.5.1 Urban Social What percentage of buildings will incorporate indoor greenery or planters? (# buildings with greenery ÷ total buildings) ×100 50.74 %
3.2.5.5.2 Urban Social What percentage of regularly occupied spaces will achieve a daylight factor of ≥2%? % of regularly occupied spaces achieving daylight factor ≥2% 60 %
3.2.5.5.3 Urban Social What percentage of occupied spaces will have visual access to nature or greenery? % of workstations/dwelling units with view of greenery 67.29 %
3.2.6.1.1 Urban Social What percentage of the population will have access to safe drinking water? (# of people with access ÷ total population) ×100 96.5 %
3.2.6.1.2 Urban Social What percentage of water quality samples will meet WHO or national standards? % of samples meeting WHO/national thresholds for microbial and chemical contaminants 100 %
3.2.6.2.1 Urban Social What percentage of the population will have access to improved sanitation facilities? (# people with improved sanitation ÷ total population) ×100 99 %
3.2.6.3 Urban Social What will be the estimated rate of homelessness per 100,000 population? (# homeless ÷ population ×100,000) 37.5 homelessness per 100,000 population
3.2.6.4 Urban Social What percentage of the homeless population will have access to emergency shelter? (# homeless with shelter ÷ total homeless) ×100 80 %
3.2.6.5.1 Urban Social What percentage of the population will live below the national poverty line? (# people below national poverty line ÷ total population) ×100 1 %
3.2.6.5.2 Urban Social What percentage of eligible households will be covered by social safety nets? (# households receiving social support ÷ total households) ×100 90 %
3.2.7.1.a Urban Social What percentage of residents will participate in civic or community programs? (# participants ÷ total residents) ×100 25.10 %
3.2.7.1.b Urban Social How many stakeholder or public consultation sessions will be held annually? # consultations/workshops/year 2.17 consultations/year
3.2.7.2.1 Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 350 metres of at least five facility types? GIS network analysis of residential areas vs. facility distribution 90 %
3.2.7.2.2 Urban Social What is the Facility mix index (variety of facility types) residents? Count of facility types available per 1000 residents 5.84 facility types
3.2.7.3.1 Urban Social How many community or cultural events will be organized annually? Total organized cultural/social events annually 3.49 events
3.2.7.3.2 Urban Social What percentage of residents will participate in community events? (# participants ÷ total residents) ×100 25.66 %
3.2.7.4.1 Urban Social What percentage of community programs will focus on inclusivity or equity? (# inclusive programs ÷ total programs) ×100 32.69 %
3.2.7.4.2 Urban Social What percentage of participants in planning processes will represent vulnerable or marginalized groups? (# vulnerable group reps ÷ total participants) ×100 15.58 %
3.2.7.5.1 Urban Social How many community centers or majlis spaces will be available per 1,000 residents? (# centers ÷ population ×1000) 1.01 per 1000 residents
3.2.7.5.2 Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 500 meters of a community space or gathering place? GIS network analysis 100 %
3.2.7.6 Urban Social How many types of community events (e.g., cultural, sports, educational) will be organized annually? Count distinct event categories (sports, cultural, educational) 3 categories
3.2.7.7 Urban Social What will the statistical diversity index applied to population demographics be? Statistical diversity index applied to population demographics 0.65
3.2.7.8.1 Urban Social What is the % of residents knowing neighbors connections? Survey results 73.75 %
3.2.7.8.2 Urban Social What percentage of residents will report high community satisfaction or trust levels? Community well-being surveys 80 %
3.2.8.1.1 Urban Social How many distinct land uses will be located within 400 meters (¼ mile) of dwellings? GIS spatial analysis of residential parcels and nearby land uses 5.77 land uses
3.2.8.1.2 Urban Social What percentage of dwellings will be located within 400 meters of six or more land uses? (Dwellings meeting criteria ÷ total dwellings) ×100 55 % of dwellings
3.2.8.1.3 Urban Social What will be the calculated land-use diversity index (e.g., Shannon Index)? Calculate Shannon Index for land-use balance 0.65
3.2.8.2.1 Urban Social How many cultural or social facilities will exist per 1,000 residents? (# cultural/social facilities ÷ population ×1000) 1.02 per 1000 residents
3.2.8.2.2 Urban Social How many distinct cultural groups will be represented in community programs? (# cultural groups represented ÷ total programs) ×100 3.37 distinct groups
3.2.8.2.3 Urban Social What percentage of surveyed residents will report feeling included in community activities? % of surveyed residents reporting inclusiveness in community life 73.75 %
3.2.8.2.4 Urban Social What will be the calculated social diversity index for the community? Calculate Simpson/Shannon Index 0.65
3.2.9.1.2 Urban Social What will be the net residential density (dwellings per hectare)? (Total dwelling units ÷ net residential land area) 24 du/ha
3.2.9.1.3 Urban Social What will be the jobs-to-residents ratio in the community? (# jobs in community ÷ total residents) 1.05 jobs per resident
3.2.9.2.1 Urban Social Will current infrastructure meet or exceed projected urban demand? Compare actual demand (water, energy, transport) vs. design capacity YES
3.2.9.2.2 Urban Social What will be the provision ratio for schools and clinics? (# schools, clinics, community centers ÷ population) ×1000 1.07 primary school per 1000 childrenclinic per 5000 residents
3.2.9.2.3 Urban Social What will be the amount of open space provided per person? (Public open space ÷ total population) 11.80 m² per person
3.2.10.1.1 Urban Social What percentage of dwellings will be within 800 meters of at least three key amenities? GIS network analysis of residential parcels and amenities 78.75 %
3.2.10.1.2 Urban Social Regarding % of dwellings within 400 m of neighborhood-scale amenities: bus stops, playgrounds)? GIS analysis of smaller-scale facilities (shops, playgrounds, bus stops) 55 %
3.2.10.1.3 Urban Social Amenity diversity index: How many distinct types of amenities are available within walking distance? Count distinct types of amenities within walking distance (retail, healthcare, education, recreation) 5.89 types
3.2.10.1.4 Urban Social What percentage of residents will rate local walkability as “good” or “excellent”? % of residents rating local walkability as “good” or “excellent” 60 %
3.2.11.1.1 Urban Social What percentage of dwellings will be within 350 meters of at least five public facility types? GIS network analysis of residential parcels vs. public facility locations 77.75 %
3.2.11.1.2 Urban Social How many distinct amenity categories will be within 350 meters of most dwellings? Count distinct amenity categories (education, health, retail, recreation, civic) 4.55 types
3.2.11.1.3 Urban Social What percentage of crossings have safe pedestrian connectivity? % of routes with sidewalks and crossings compliant with design standards 90 %
3.2.11.2.1 Urban Social What percentage of peak users will be supported with bicycle parking? (# bike spaces ÷ occupant load ×100) 4.79 %
3.2.11.2.2 Urban Social What will be the provision ratio for end-of-trip facilities? (# showers/changing rooms per building) 0.98 per gender per 5000 m²
3.2.11.2.3 Urban Social What percentage of buildings will provide bicycle parking and support facilities? (# buildings with facilities ÷ total buildings) ×100 76.4 %
3.2.11.3 Urban Social What percentage of facilities will include accessible wayfinding systems? % of facilities with accessible wayfinding systems (visual, tactile, auditory) 90 %
3.2.12.1.1 Urban Social How many project stages will have completed formal engagement? % of project stages (pre-design, design, post-occupancy) with documented engagement 2.14 stages
3.2.12.1.2 Urban Social What percentage of households or stakeholders will have been consulted? (# households consulted ÷ total households) ×100 32.99 %
3.2.12.2 Urban Social What percentage of the public realm will include traditional or local cultural design elements? (Public realm with cultural motifs ÷ total public realm) ×100 27.98 %
3.2.12.3.1 Urban Social How many community events will be organized per year? Count of cultural, social, or recreational events annually 3.6
3.2.12.3.2 Urban Social What will be the volunteer participation rate among residents? (# volunteers ÷ total residents) ×100 10.28 %
3.2.12.4.1 Urban Social How many sustainability or awareness workshops will be conducted each year? Count workshops or sessions provided 2.18 Workshops
3.2.12.4.2 Urban Social What percentage of residents will participate in education or awareness programs? (# participants ÷ total residents) ×100 11.25 %
3.2.13.1 Urban Social Regarding Proximity to Amenities & Services: amenities (parks, schools, healthcare, or community facilities)? GIS network analysis of residential parcels vs. amenities 78.75 %
3.2.13.2.a Urban Social What will be the Walk Score® or equivalent walkability index for your community? GIS-based scoring system of amenities and connectivity 73.75 %
3.2.13.2.b Urban Social What will be the intersection density within the neighborhood? (# intersections ÷ land area km²) 90 %
3.2.13.3.a Urban Social How much public green space will be available per person? (Total public green space ÷ population) 10.13 m²/person
3.2.13.3.b Urban Social What percentage of dwellings will be within 300 meters of public parks or open spaces? GIS buffer analysis 76.25 %
3.2.13.4.a Urban Social What percentage of residents will be satisfied with their local community and services? Resident surveys 73.75 %
3.2.13.4.b Urban Social What percentage of residents will report high trust or social connection with neighbors? Surveys 65.82 %
3.2.13.5 Urban Social What will be the average self-reported life satisfaction score (1–10)? Resident surveys (Likert scale) 7.38 1-10
3.2.13.6 Urban Social What percentage of residents will report good or very good health? Surveys 78.46 %
3.2.13.7.a Urban Social What will be the violent crime rate in the community? (# violent crimes ÷ population ×100,000) 52.5 per 100,000 person
3.2.13.7.b Urban Social What percentage of residents will feel safe within the community? Resident surveys 87.5 %
3.2.13.8.a Urban Social What will be the average one-way commute time to key destinations? Household travel surveys; transport data 23.32 min
3.2.13.8.b Urban Social What percentage of residents will commute using sustainable transport (public, cycling, walking)? (# residents using non-car modes ÷ total commuters) ×100 45 %
3.2.13.9.a Urban Social What will be the public open space area per person? (Open space ÷ population) 11.88 m²
3.2.13.9.b Urban Social What percentage of open spaces will be equipped with amenities like seating, play, or sports areas? (# of equipped open spaces ÷ total open spaces) ×100 73.73 %
3.2.13.10.a Urban Social How much shorter will the average walking distance to facilities be compared to UPC standards? (UPC standard distance – actual distance) ÷ UPC standard 24.42 % shorter distance
3.2.13.10.b Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 500 meters of key services (healthcare, education, leisure)? GIS accessibility analysis 100 %
3.2.13.11.a Urban Social How many libraries or cultural centers will exist per 100,000 residents? (# facilities ÷ population ×100,000) 1.04 per 100,000 residents
3.2.13.11.b Urban Social How many sports or leisure facilities will exist per 1,000 residents? (# facilities ÷ population ×1000) 2.13 per 100,000 residents
3.2.14.1.a Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 500–800 meters of a park or sports facility? GIS buffer analysis of residences to nearest recreation facility 78.42 %
3.2.14.1.b Urban Social How much recreational space will be provided per 1,000 residents? (Recreational space ÷ population ×1000) 1.87 ha/1000 residents
3.2.14.2.a Urban Social What will be the typical outdoor thermal comfort index (UTCI/PMV)? Field measurements; thermal modeling 30.33 UTCI/PMV
3.2.14.2.b Urban Social What percentage of seating areas in the public realm will be shaded? (# shaded seating ÷ total seating) ×100 76.95 %
3.2.14.2.c Urban Social How many stakeholder or public consultation sessions will be held annually? % of days with AQI ≤100 95 %
3.2.14.3.a Urban Social What percentage of residents will be within 1 km of a primary healthcare facility? GIS network analysis 76.81 %
3.2.14.3.b Urban Social What will be the average distance to the nearest hospital? GIS buffer analysis 3.96 km
3.2.14.4.a Urban Social What will be the adult obesity rate in your community? (# obese adults ÷ total adults) ×100 2.5 %
3.2.14.4.b Urban Social What percentage of residents will meet WHO physical activity guidelines? Surveys; health records 66 %
3.2.14.5 Urban Social What will be the average WEMWBS score for residents? Survey (14/7 items; 14–70 score) 51.35 score
3.2.14.6.a Urban Social What will be the available green/open space per person? (Total open/green space ÷ population) 11.88 m²
3.2.14.6.b Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 800 meters of a park? GIS buffer analysis 67.5 %
3.2.14.7 Urban Social What percentage of the population will have access to sports facilities within 500 meters? GIS accessibility analysis 75.88 %
3.2.14.8.a Urban Social How many physicians will be available per 100,000 residents? (# physicians ÷ population ×100,000) 242.62 physicians
3.2.14.9.1 Urban Social What percentage of the required ventilation rates will be achieved ? Mechanical system commissioning 97.22 ASHRAE 62.1 baseline
3.2.14.10 Urban Social What will be the distance of smoke-free zones from building entrances or air intakes? Distance from entrances/air intakes 25 m
3.2.14.11.a Urban Social What will be the total length of walking and cycling routes per 1000 residents? Total km ÷ population ×1000 1.5 km/1000 residents
3.2.14.11.b Urban Social What percentage of buildings have access to Active Living & Recreation circulation paths? (# buildings with active features ÷ total buildings) ×100 74.2 %
3.2.14.12 Urban Social What percentage of residents will live within 300 meters of a green or blue space? GIS buffer analysis 78.67 %
3.3.1.1.1 Urban Environmental What percentage of the site area will be classified as brownfield? (Brownfield area ÷ total site area) ×100 46.22 %
3.3.1.1.a Urban Environmental What will be the ratio of farmland replacement achieved through urban or rooftop agriculture? (Area of new urban agriculture ÷ area of impacted farmland) 2
3.3.1.1.b Urban Environmental What percentage of the total site area will be dedicated to community or rooftop farming? (Urban agriculture area ÷ total site area) ×100 2 %
3.3.1.2.a Urban Environmental What percentage of the site area will have been previously developed land? (Previously developed area ÷ total site area) ×100 70.93 %
3.3.1.2.b Urban Environmental What percentage of new development will be built on infill sites? (Infill site area ÷ total new development area) ×100 51.35 %
3.3.1.3.1 Urban Environmental What will be the biodiversity index value for landscaped vegetation? Calculate biodiversity index of planted species 0.53
3.3.1.4 Urban Environmental Regarding Green Star Brownfield/Urban Priority: or urban-priority sites. What percentage of total development will occur on brownfield land? (Brownfield area ÷ total site area) ×100 49.06 %
3.3.2.1 Urban Environmental What will be the weighted average GWP of refrigerants used? (Σ (GWP × refrigerant charge) ÷ Σ refrigerant charge) 48.69
3.3.2.2.a Urban Environmental Regarding Peak Electricity Demand Reduction: grid efficiency. What percentage of peak electricity demand will be reduced? (Baseline peak kW – reduced peak kW ÷ baseline peak kW) ×100 13.19 %
3.3.2.2.b Urban Environmental What percentage of peak demand will be met through renewable or stored energy? (On-site renewables + storage supply ÷ peak demand) ×100 13.75 %
3.3.3.1 Urban Environmental What will be the per capita GHG emission rate? (Total GHG ÷ population) 4.51 tCO₂e/person/year
3.3.3.2.a Urban Environmental What will be the percentage reduction in operational GHG emissions? (Baseline emissions – actual emissions ÷ baseline emissions) ×100 23.63 %
3.3.3.2.b Urban Environmental What percentage of total energy demand will be met through renewable sources? (Renewable energy consumption ÷ total energy consumption) ×100 31.68 %
3.3.3.2.c Urban Environmental What portion of residual emissions will be offset through carbon credits? (Offsets purchased ÷ residual GHG emissions) ×100 15 % of residual allowed
3.3.4.1.a Urban Environmental What will be the citywide GHG intensity per GDP unit? (Total annual GHG emissions ÷ City GDP) 3.99 kg CO₂/USD GDP
3.3.4.1.b Urban Environmental What will be the citywide GHG emission per GDP unit? (Total annual GHG ÷ population) tCO₂e/person/year
3.3.4.2 Urban Environmental What will be the average GWP of refrigerants in use? (Σ (GWP × refrigerant charge) ÷ Σ refrigerant charge) 41.57 GWP
3.3.5.1.a Urban Environmental What will be the operational CO₂ emission rate per person annually? (Total operational CO₂ ÷ total residents) 4.76 tCO₂/person/year
3.3.5.2.a Urban Environmental What will be the non-residential CO₂ emission intensity per square meter annually? Annual CO₂ ÷ GFA (residential) 25.43 intensity/m²
3.3.5.3 Urban Environmental What is the projected percentage reduction in CO2 emissions compared to the baseline? (Baseline CO₂ – Actual CO₂ ÷ Baseline CO₂) ×100 15 %
3.3.5.4.a Urban Environmental What proportion of total energy consumption will be supplied by renewable sources? (Renewable energy ÷ total energy demand) ×100 31.30 %
3.3.5.4.b Urban Environmental What percentage of renewable energy generation will be produced on-site? (On-site renewables ÷ total renewables) ×100 31.86 %
3.3.5.5 Urban Environmental What portion of residual CO₂ emissions will be offset ? (Offsets ÷ residual CO₂ emissions) ×100 20.83 %
3.3.5.6 Urban Environmental What percentage of infrastructure will have undergone climate risk assessment? (# infrastructure assets assessed ÷ total assets) ×100 77.27 %
3.3.6.1.a Urban Environmental What proportion of the site will be preserved or restored as ecologically significant habitat? GIS land surveys; ecological studies 11.91 % of site retained as habitat
3.3.6.1.b Urban Environmental What percentage of the total site area will be conserved as ecologically significant habitat? (Habitat conserved ÷ total site area) ×100 21.74 %
3.3.6.2.a Urban Environmental What will be the amount of green/open space per person? (Total public green/open space ÷ population) 10.13 m²/person
3.3.6.2.b Urban Environmental What will be the average green/open space provided per dwelling unit? (Total green space ÷ # residential units) 33.21 m²/unit
3.3.6.3.a Urban Environmental What percentage of the site or street network will be covered by tree canopy? (Canopy area ÷ total site/street area) ×100 28.75 % canopy cover
3.3.6.3.b Urban Environmental What percentage of sidewalks will be shaded at peak summer midday? (Shaded street length ÷ total street length) ×100 52.94 % of sidewalks
3.3.6.4.a Urban Environmental What will be the percentage of net biodiversity gain achieved? Pre- and post-development ecological surveys; DEFRA/UN metrics 17.5 % net biodiversity gain
3.3.6.4.b Urban Environmental What is the measured species diversity index for the area? Ecological monitoring 0.53
3.3.6.5 Urban Environmental What percentage of dwellings will be located within 300–400 m of a green or natural area? GIS buffer analysis 90 %
3.3.6.6 Urban Environmental What percentage of landscaped areas will use native or adaptive species? (Native/adaptive planting area ÷ total landscaped area) ×100 55 species
3.3.7.1.a Urban Environmental What percentage of dwellings will be located within 400 m of a bus or BRT stop? GIS buffer analysis (network distance) 62.5 %
3.3.7.1.b Urban Environmental What percentage of dwellings will be within 800 m of a metro or rail station? GIS network analysis 67.96 %
3.3.7.2.a Urban Environmental What will be the total length of bicycle lanes or paths per 1,000 residents? (Length of bike lanes ÷ population) ×1000 1 km/1000 residents
3.3.7.2.b Urban Environmental What percentage of streets will include continuous sidewalks? (# streets with sidewalks ÷ total streets) ×100 80 %
3.3.7.2.c Urban Environmental What percentage of sidewalks will be shaded ? (Shaded sidewalks ÷ total sidewalks) ×100 50 %
3.3.7.3.a Urban Environmental What proportion of all trips will be made by sustainable modes (walking, cycling, or public transport)? Household travel surveys; smart card data 45 %
3.3.7.3.b Urban Environmental What percentage of trips will be made using private vehicles? (Trips by private cars ÷ total trips) ×100 36.25 %
3.3.7.4.a Urban Environmental What will be the average number of parking spaces per dwelling? (Total parking ÷ total dwellings) 1.00 space per dwelling
3.3.7.4.b Urban Environmental What percentage of parking spaces will be allocated to EV or carpool users? (EV + carpool spaces ÷ total spaces) ×100 10.85 %
3.3.7.5.a Urban Environmental How many dedicated bicycle storage spaces will be available per dwelling or building? (# storage spaces ÷ dwellings) 1.03 per dwelling
3.3.7.5.b Urban Environmental What percentage of parking spaces will be equipped with EV charging points? (# EV chargers ÷ parking spaces) ×100 10.21 %